Skip to main content

Type in Photoshop CS6 44 Responses

Last post: 1 year, 7 months ago | Thread started: Apr 23, 13, 11:31 a.m.

RespondNew TopicDisable Images

  • duckseason

    Recently upgraded and have stumbled upon something a bit odd.

    I have some type set at 43pt:

    http://i.imgur.com/Mb4uXso.png

    Just below it I have more type which, apparently, is also set at 43pt?

    http://i.imgur.com/MmKtU65.png

    When I first click on the lower text, it states that it's 77pt (which sounds/looks right) but as soon as I move the cursor the value changes to 43pt.

    Is this a new "feature" in CS6?

    Any advice appreciated.

    Apr 23, 13, 11:31 a.m. – Permalink
  • linearch

    http://davechapfilms.com/photosh…

    • This looks like it answers it.
      Thanks.
      duckseason
    + add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earApr 23, 13, 12:30 p.m. – Permalink
  • Mr_Right

    It's not doing it for me. Maybe restart photoshop/cornputer?

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earApr 23, 13, 12:31 p.m. – Permalink
  • monospaced

    Is it something you can reproduce regularly, or is it just this one instance?

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earApr 23, 13, 12:33 p.m. – Permalink
  • duckseason

    Based on the link that linearch posted, it appears to occur when transformed text is involved. This was the case in the document I was working on.

    From Adobe:
    "Starting with CS6, if you had two text boxes at 18pt and you transformed one to be 200% larger, that one would appear at (roughly) 36pt, but you could also select them BOTH, change the font size to (say) 22pt, and one would go to 22 and the other 44 (200% of 22)."

    next note >add note

    You must be logged in to add a note. Login now or register for an account.

    Cancel
    Dog-earApr 23, 13, 12:43 p.m. – Permalink

Login or Register to respond to this

Skip to main content