religion

Out of context: Reply #137

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,158 Responses
  • albums0

    Miko, don't respond, he's resorted to name calling as your strong will has offended M_S by not joining his beliefs

    • agreedmonospaced
    • Yeh, sorry about that. The Dawkins thing overstepped the mark.Morning_star
    • I am proud to sound like Dawkins to you, in all aspects. I'm a grown, educated, 40yr old Englishman with a science..mikotondria3
    • ...degree, what'd you expect ?
      Dude.
      mikotondria3
    • I hope you weren't offended, truly. I liked what you said on the previous page. I have questions, that's all and you're..Morning_star
    • right, they are rudimentary and naive. But It annoys the tits off me the complete dismissal of compelling evidence that runs...Morning_star
    • contrary to the current scientific view.Morning_star
    • For me it's neither about god or religion, it's about the certainty of a over growing set of folk, usually gathered under the banner of Atheist that they...Morning_star
    • Atheist that they know all there is to know and that the central fundaments of science hold true, always.Morning_star
    • It's cool, it's a natural response to what you perceive as an approach that runs contrary to discovering what could be...mikotondria3
    • .. exciting fundamental things about the universe. Telepathy, psychic phenomena all get excluded from 'mainstream..mikotondria3
    • ..science" because, at the moment, they aren't science, and are not experimentally valid. Nothing about atheism.mikotondria3
    • I totally understand where you're at, I was there for many years. Sometimes I miss it. It's hard to let go of that dream...mikotondria3
    • ...but it's not fact, and there are no shortcuts to the scientific method. The moment it is proved to be real, bingo !mikotondria3

View thread