Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #5046

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • shapesalad3

    Agree.. all indicators lead to lab designed, accidental escaped = has highest probability.

    shapesalad 3Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • "this doesn't look like a Chinese failure, its a failure of the international scientific community" - you gonna stop that CCP shit now then?kingsteven
    • his stupid reservoir dog cosplay suit is bugging me._niko
    • Are we discounting the fact that there are dozens of corona viruses we’ve been getting for centuries that aren’t lab grown?monospaced
    • Because that leads me to believe this is just another naturally occurring virus. Like all the others.monospaced
    • @mono and yet didn't turn into pandemics while this specific one did
      "lab designed" = gain of function research, based on a natural occurring strain      grafician
    • Was Spanish flu lab grown as well? Cuz that was a pandemicpango
    • spanish flu was influenza, coronaviruses are something else
      didn't you boys learned anything by now?      grafician
    • What's that something else?pango
    • https://www.youtube.…pango
    • Former cdc head says it was probably from a lab. Something about how zoonotic viruses don’t just jump species then become one of the most infectious pathogens.monNom
    • They ease into it. Get to know you a bit. Then get good at infection and transmission... so that’s an interesting takemonNom
    • Spot the Rachel Maddow followers in the commentsGuyFawkes
    • Obviously not all coronaviruses are the same. Even the variants are different. THis one attacks the respiratory system. That does NOT imply it's lab grownmonospaced
    • My point is that NOT all indicators point to lab designed. In fact, most indicators point out that coronaviruses are varied and quite normal.monospaced
    • lab design does not automatically equal a more deadly strain, why would you assume that?monospaced
    • There have been many deadly viruses that are very natural. Including the flu and all of its mutationsmonospaced
    • Yep, we started this pandemic with statistical modeling based on a flu pandemic from 100 years ago. That doesn't mean it's uncommon, it means we don't know...kingsteven
    • We should assume accidental leak as a failure of global scientific community and move these labs out of cities (look up the location of BSL 3,4 labs near you)kingsteven
    • You can read about the smallpox/ebola/new covid strains being transported and studied in your local lab while you ponder gain of functionkingsteven
    • I imagine when meta analysis of studies during the pandemic attempts to pinpoint the origins, we will find that these mutations can happen and the virus maykingsteven
    • have appeared earlier, intermediary species and a bunch of other variables that will open up the possibility of natural mutation...kingsteven
    • The only way we'll know for sure is if it's something obvious like that French scientist suggested and a huge chunk of RNA is from HIV lolkingsteven
    • A virus like this could come from virtually anywhere. If you look at where the Huanan Market is located, it's about 800 meters away from one of the biggestyuekit
    • high speed train lines in China. There are millions of migrant workers traveling back and forth, there are tens of millions of animals sold for their fur or foryuekit
    • food, known to carry SARS viruses. So of course it could have leaked from a lab given there is one in the same city, but Weinstein is talking nonsense with hisyuekit
    • 95% probability. Similar to his "99% effective" claim for ivermectin. If the CIA hasn't figured it out yet, I don't think some podcasters did.yuekit
    • yupmonospaced
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread