Artificial Intelligence
- Started
- Last post
- 1,261 Responses
- ShenanigansTV0
This has me believing AGI is upon us.
- Also has me terrified of the Evil version.ShenanigansTV
- that's pretty goodYakuZoku
- We will always be 2-5 yrs away from AGI...jonny_quest_lives
- PhanLo0
- It's already happened, and yet here we are. The part of this scenario that to me is missing, is the possibility that we are the AI.ShenanigansTV
- HAL90012
i've read today that people are creating OnlyFans accounts with fake chicks created with A.I. ... and it works, they're banking mooney
crazy world we're in iam telling ya
- neverscared1
- Just a prank, bro.palimpsest
- Maybe a witch-hunt effect and it's not AI generated after all?NBQ00
- LiarsOBBTKN
- it was AI generated someone uploaded it to Adobe stock and didn't tag it as Ai generated. the user who uploaded has had all their content removed.jonny_quest_lives
- https://pbs.twimg.co…jonny_quest_lives
- I usually vet stuff with my eyes, not an online tool. Lol Wacom suuuun!PhanLo
- Buy Huion gear instead. Wacom is overpriced shit nowadays.face_melter
- cascading failures... overworked junior artist, indifferent non existent creative director couldn't be bothered to review...jonny_quest_lives
- ultimate client advertising team sign off via email along the lines of "looks great send it"jonny_quest_lives
- shit like this happens i often wonder how come i never get to deal with the DGAF client base. i get the pixel fuckers everytimejonny_quest_lives
- "i dunno it needs something" or "the client is sending a new raw render can we get a quick paintover on all deliverables"jonny_quest_lives
- Lie.sted
- Just fucking publish the source file, case closed, everybody can go home.sted
- Y’all crying about cars while riding a horseimbecile
- Shouldn't it be that we worrying about horshoes while riding cars?palimpsest
- Or are we riding horses without wearing shoes?palimpsest
- Crying about clown shoes while we can't fit in a car?palimpsest
- Carrying horses while crying about cars?palimpsest
- What about infichment?palimpsest
- @imbecile I'm not against that they're using an AI generated image but I think its quite controversial. For me, lying about this is unacceptable,sted
- and that is not just limited to this situation.sted
- Ramanisky20
- George cared about his craft. AI cares about nothingIanbolton
- I listened to a few minutes of this ai Carlin... not a fan. It’s just really weird.Ramanisky2
- sted2
"Unfortunately, the business model is disappointing for a highly specialised niche GPT creator. Only Plus, Team or Enterprise users can use the GPTs. Only US builders will then be paid a tiny percentage (of the users' monthly subscription costs) based on their engagement with the GPTs. This means that "bullshit GPTs" that retain users for a long time and encourage them to interact with the GPT are favoured in your business model. Highly specialised GPTs with expert knowledge that a user would only use once or twice, because then all questions are answered, require a payment barrier consisting of a one-off payment. For example: "Pay $99 and ABC GPT is unlocked". "
- https://fortune.com/…jonny_quest_lives
- https://i.imgur.com/…jonny_quest_lives
- https://i.imgur.com/…jonny_quest_lives
- hehh yeah :Dsted
- I would like to see this one in action: https://arxiv.org/pd…sted
- neverscared0
- ...why automatic statistics gets so many designer enthusiasm up is embarrasing... must be their narrow understanding of design anyhow...neverscared
- we should all be on strike like the actors-resses have been... but i guess not...neverscared
- Who will they be replaced by?
Netflix movies are already generic and boring as fuck. Human beings still make the process better.PhanLo - I still can't imagine a non-creative prompting away to get the story boards.PhanLo
- I really enjoy using AI, but it's quite limited, even after all the developments in the last year.PhanLo
- Let’s hope. But dont forget the talentless fucks at the top of every company are driven by one thing only- money. I was told a story about a super successful_niko
- Entrepreneur who made billions building up and selling companies, a friend of mine was working for him and daily he would hear “ I can’t wait to replace all you_niko
- Dumb fucks with ai” and my friend was in the business development side of things. No one is safe. Nobody gives a shit about you and your creativity, you’re just_niko
- A necessary expense at the moment, if they can get half the results at a tenth of the price they’ll do it. Be the boss. Figure out how to replace yourself with_niko
- Ai and just hustle clients or create a product or software. It’s the only way forward, learn to thrive with ai or perish._niko
- I think people are extrapolating from "AI outputs cool-looking image" to "and then the AI will become superintelligent and I can fire everyone and just enter ayuekit
- prompt." In reality this would probably require hiring more people just to get the AI to work properly, cover the edge cases and paper over things it can't do.yuekit
- I’d agree with you and want to if the rate of change and improvement wasn’t so blindingly rapid, every day there are new tools out there to make it easier_niko
- With storyboarding for instance maintaining consistent characters and style would be a challenge. You also still can't render text reliably.yuekit
- no but your base image/comp and art direction gets closer to actual execution. less confusion for client, imo.doesnotexist
- hydro743
- oh really? fuck off.sted
- that's basically admitting that they build a for profit business based on stolen data.
every single person whose ip was used can sue themsted - "Sue everybody" - Brett Weirutopian
- evidently they should have waited t till the copyright laws are changed so that they can train their models... and not steal it all beforehand... fatalneverscared
- and idiotic risk they took... lets hope they pay the proper price for it not being patient enuff and raid the scene like criminals..neverscared
- sillicon valley boys are not above the law...neverscared
- Why is this a photo of a screen?palimpsest
- ^^ Dramatic effect..hydro74
- It’s almost as if they’re gonna have to come up with a business plan, approaching content creators, publishers to license content first, crazy pffftprophetone
- I love how they frame it as saving OpenAI is saving ai itself, no dudes you’ve been labouring under a strategy that you will simply get your wayprophetone
- This is like saying I need the RIAA to allow me to sample Taylor Swift’s catalog for free in order to save the LP I already made that benefits me directlyprophetone
- to save the music industryprophetone
- Boycott ChatGPT.palimpsest
- still dunno what chatgpt does well... i mean really. other than the twitter grifters who say it does everything i've found it to be consistently unreliable.jonny_quest_lives
- maybe i underestimate the market for verbose incorrect answers.jonny_quest_lives
- What did you ax it?palimpsest
- so.. anyone here want my NFT's i made from some Promptshydro74
- You bet, get’em minted and I’ll re mortgage my haciendaprophetone
- iam gonna flippin sue hydro when he releases his next nft prompt...neverscared
- i like chat-gpt but i mostly use it for SQL, Excel and Regular Expressions. i'm not sure why it's expected to write novels and draw pictures...kingsteven
- ... because it can.palimpsest
- it can also plagiarism check, more a comment about the irrelevancy of the lords question and response... the things it does well fall under transformative usekingsteven
- or 'the things no one complains about' of course banning scraping is going to fuck AI research. the NYT case is about open AIs breach of established law.kingsteven
- which would be fine if plagiarism wasn't their business model. surely all they have to do is link to their sources and its technically transformative, in thekingsteven
- same way as the law protects search, and within the capabilities of the AIkingsteven
- how do you expect ai to be anything without being trained on copyright?doesnotexist
- neverscared0
https://www.theverge.com/2024/1/…
Popular drawing tablet manufacturer Wacom is the latest target being slammed by the digital art community after appearing to use AI-generated images in ads. Over the weekend, creatives across X (formerly Twitter) and TikTok noticed that Wacom was promoting its Intuos pen tablet with a dragon illustration that showed telltale marks of AI-generated images — such as questionable scale designs and fur blending unnaturally into other sections of the image.
Artists are making creative companies apologize for using AI
- Kinda ironic that Wacom sells drawing tablets and then they utilise prompts for their ads.NBQ00
- Ya think?Nairn
- wait do we care about this?doesnotexist
- elahon2
- i can't quite put my finger on it...imbecile
- for the mutants in your life_niko
- YIkES.Ramanisky2
- Give em a handwhatthefunk
- sted0
idk what but its happening in a few hours.
- The rabbit pocket companion can also pleasure your CLINTNBQ00
- Don' get what's so cool about it and why would I really need it when i can have all what i need on my smartphone, instead of carrying an additional gadgetNBQ00
- You can't sell an app for $199.palimpsest
- neverscared0
Cory Doctorow: What Kind of Bubble is AI?
Of course AI is a bubble. It has all the hallmarks of a classic tech bubble. Pick up a rental car at SFO and drive in either direction on the 101 – north to San Francisco, south to Palo Alto – and every single billboard is advertising some kind of AI company. Every business plan has the word “AI” in it, even if the business itself has no AI in it. Even as two major, terrifying wars rage around the world, every newspaper has an above-the-fold AI headline and half the stories on Google News as I write this are about AI. I’ve had to make rule for my events: The first person to mention AI owes everyone else a drink.
It’s a bubble.
Tech bubbles come in two varieties: The ones that leave something behind, and the ones that leave nothing behind. Sometimes, it can be hard to guess what kind of bubble you’re living through until it pops and you find out the hard way.
- A bubble, but it's also already making $$$. The difference between Meta and the dotcom era was they learned they had to make money to be viable.formed
- So companies like MSFT, GOOG, etc., are going to make billions from it, as will AI.com, Salesforce, etc.
As long as you aren't completely gambling it isformed - a real part of tech and the future. It's already been proven to make $$.
Look at NVDA, solid investment making butt loads from AI.formed - true... def. will be a big part of the future.. for automated statistics its quite overhyped...neverscared
- it seems to me though al lot of people think its the only true future .. and thats as pathetic as it gets.neverscared
- sted7
- A whole new genre of horror could be inspired by this picture.skinny_puppy
- Happy new year from the peacock clan!_niko
- neverscared0
ok, I've now read the full NYT complaint filed this morning vs OpenAI and Microsoft. I'm impressed - it's future-focused around fair value for work vital to democracy. It also contains 220k pages of exhibits although the pages of Ex J stood out to me.
- it reads like they're going for a settlement though, or is there an expectation of some sort of legislation? punitive measures?kingsteven
- trained AI-s can't have a monetary value.sted
- ^ because in the US 'transformative use' is interpreted based on precedent set by google search, which relies on linking back to the sources. EU has actual lawskingsteven
- around scraping and storing information, the in US it seems these cases rely on arguing they're out of line with the legal precedentkingsteven
- it would seem that the law on transformative-use which enables scraping datasets (and having no 'monetary value') is so interwoven with previous IP lawkingsteven
- that it couldn't be changed without overturning a century's worth of arcane IP rulings. but they can still argue that they're out of line with the current lawkingsteven
- i can totally imagine this will lead to a settlement or a ruling which appears punitive but actually somehow validates OpenAI's business model furtherkingsteven
- and both legal teams are currently using GPT-4 to prepare their cases.kingsteven
- If OpenAI does collapse, WeWork style, it will likely be seen as a tale of hubris.
They knew infringement was going to be a major issue.They proceeded anywayneverscared - That will not play well in front of juries.
In the end it could devour them.neverscared - and everyone else reading about it from the NYT on archive.is rather than feeding one line in to GPT and waiting for it to plagiarise.kingsteven
- copyright is not abolished...neverscared
- the scale of openAI is too huge, if it was to 'fail' it would be a stunt by microsoft to aquire and further commoditise the tech. MS could have bought NYTkingsteven
- twice for the investment they've put in to OpenAI. Considering the US gov't push to stay at the forefront of AI tech and the billions invested in AI startups...kingsteven
- i just don't think anything will come from it other than a headline grabbing '500m settlement' and a slap on the wrist.kingsteven
- PhanLo6
- the inertia book was made in 2001, 100% digital works printed, not a single page what isn't a piece of art.sted
- reminds me of fightclub movie - Sticking Feathers Up your Butt Does Not Make You A Chicken-neverscared
- PhanLo1
- https://twitter.com/…PhanLo
- why would they hide it?robthelad
- formed1
Apple’s iPhone Design Chief Enlisted by Jony Ive, Sam Altman to Work on AI Devices
-Design executive Tang Tan is set to leave Apple in February
-Tan will join Ive’s LoveFrom design studio, work on AI projecthttps://www.bloomberg.com/news/a…
Interesting...here come shiny, over-priced gadgets that are smarter than we are.
- I honestly think Tang Tan leaving might have more to do with the Apple Watch Masimo Lawsuit... As for Jony he's gotta have FU moneyjonny_quest_lives
- if you are in the market for a $60k turntable Jony's got you covered: https://www.linn.co.…jonny_quest_lives
- then there was this as he is technically Sir Jonathan "Jony" Paul Ive CBE/KBE:jonny_quest_lives
- https://www.wallpape…jonny_quest_lives