So David Icke was right?

Out of context: Reply #36

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 114 Responses
  • ukit20

    If you read enough of anything, you will get drawn into it and it will start to seem credible because you are not hearing the other side. However IMO, the chances of some random person knowing all the world's secrets are extremely low. If there is a global elite ruling us and manipulating world events I think an ex sports journalist who hears voices is going to be the last guy who knows about it.

    But actually I find conspiracy theories pretty fascinating and fun to read, even the ridiculous ones. Like Richard D. James said recently even if its not real it's the greatest science fiction story ever written.

    One of my random aspirations if I ever have time is to create one of those two or three hour You Tube conspiracy videos. Fill it with the most ridiculous unsubstantiated claims and see how many views it gets :)

    • A student of Mr Anton Wilson?
      :)
      detritus
    • That first paragraph is hilarious. THAT'S your reasoning? Haha...dear oh dear there is no hope.set
    • are you for real? thought you were okay. your reasoning is terrible. look at history. look at how media works for those that feed it.fadein11
    • feed it. 1st rule of planet earth - keep an open mind.fadein11
    • What's wrong with that reasoning?? Not trying to argue, I'm just wondering why you would find Icke more credible than any other random person out there.ukit2
    • than any other random person out there.ukit2
    • It surprises me that people can be so skeptical of government and elites (which is in many cases, well deserved) but then skepticism seemingly flies out the window when the narrative is one that they agree withukit2
    • skepticism seemingly flies out the window when the narrative is one that they agree withukit2

View thread