So David Icke was right?

Out of context: Reply #83

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 114 Responses
  • detritus-1

    Hey look, it's this thread again, just after even more details have spilt out about how everyone at the BBC knew about Savile's perversions.

    I guess the Space Reptiles are real too!

    • At this point - anyone who stills thinks the concept of off world intelligence (be it reptilian or other) is completely and utterly crazy...set
    • simply isn't well enough read on the subject and therefore openly broadcasts how useless their opinion is.set
    • Uh huh, ok, because that's specifically what I meant, yeah.

      You wearing your Icke-Brand­™ turquoise shell suit today?
      detritus
    • ­? wtf?detritus
    • Also curious to learn what you KNOW about 'off world intelligence' and relativism-busting science that idiots like me don't.

      Gosh I have such foolish opinions!
      detritus
    • lol @ taking it so personally. I guess you're quite audibly one of the unread.set
    • Also, for the record I didn't for a second insinuate that I thought you meant anything in particular at all...set
    • ...but now you mention it, yes, thinking quite bigotedly that off world intelligence hasn't played any part in human development is incredibly foolish.set
    • Which is exactly your own insinuation, or are you really that obtuse? If not - where did I say that? All I've ever saud is that Icke is a delusional fraud.detritus
    • "Gosh I have such foolish opinions!"set
    • You were vehemently insulted by my statement, which would suggest you don't agree with it. That and I know you don't. I'm not really assuming anything here...set
    • Icke challenges people's belief systems, those who passionately dislike him or call him a fraud are simply playing out their own defensive insecurities...set
    • but it's ok, I understand.set
    • Yurimon much?detritus
    • 'Vehemently insulted' haha, lay off the weed and pay a bit more attention to what people actually say and try and be a little less histrionic, set.detritus
    • Ridicule, insults, accusations, defensiveness.

      hehehehe. bless ya.
      set
    • We'll never agree on anything Detritus, we both know that. I honestly wasn't attacking you or your belief system with my original note.set
    • Well I guess I was, but not directly. Anyway, I hope you enjoy the rest of your day old fruit.set
    • I know the chances of off-world intelligence are high, and I agree it's there. But set, do you really think there's undeniable evidence or proof of it?monospaced
    • please don't say obleki tepescarabin
    • It's gobekli tepe, but I wouldn't cite that as evidence, though interesting. Derinkuyu or Pumapunko are even more interesting..set
    • you believe aliens are responsible for those sites?scarabin
    • It's obvious knowledge and technology was used that is far more advanced than is credited to the people of that time. Who or where that came from, I don't knowset
    • As I already said, I wouldn't cite any of those sites as evidence for extraterrestrial intelligence. Though personally I think they're related.set
    • man is a highly intelligent and inventive species. i wouldn't take the credit of being able to make a straight line in soft stone away from himscarabin
    • so what is it you think aliens contributed to us?scarabin

View thread