The bible..
Out of context: Reply #559
- Started
- Last post
- 571 Responses
- gramme0
I am just fine panda. I didn't answer all of your questions and claims because I and others have answered those same questions from other people in the greatest amount of detail I/we can gather. This discussion has been going on long before you stepped in, so you'll forgive me if I don't pull up every thread where I have ever made a coherent argument for creationism and it's attendant wolrdviews. I intend to discuss this with you via email when I am not actually under a deadline, hopefully this weekend. I actually have work to accomplish, believe it or not, and I really need to stop getting embroiled with you lot.
I think it's hilarious that you call me "vitriolic" in light of the way you talk. I didn't get mad because you "exposed me as a fraud" (nice try), but because you are rude and can't seem to just let your arguments speak for themselves. That ultimately waters down your argument and makes it difficult to take you seriously.
On atheism/humanism, you are simply dissecting my words and taking me out of context. Again, nice try. There's not really much I can do to argue against your unassailable "logic" in that regard...why do I even bother.
It's obvious that you refuse to buy the notion of ID (forget about specifics like Christianity for the moment) mainly because you cannot conceive of something more powerful than your own logic. I learned some years ago that such an approach to life is arrogant, deluded and leads to nowhere but misery and loneliness.
And that my friend is where it all falls down, and that is why we are chasing our tails.
If you care to continue the conversation in a civilized manner, email me: