Logotype Critique
Out of context: Reply #1
- Started
- Last post
- 32 Responses
- SkyPoo0
Hey Gramme, You're brave asking for a critique of a religion based project, I salute ya!
I like one and two more than three and four. Something about the forcing of the letters in three and four looks too much, like its totaly at the expense of the integrity of the letters. This may be due to the monweighted simple font, I don't know. It maybe looks a bit 'cheap' due to lack of character.
I really like one and two. I like the flow and bounce and the togetheress of the letterforms. I could be being realy naive here, but it somehow doesn't look particularly 'Christian'. That may not even be an issue but it almost has an exotic kind of vibe that I wouldn't expect a western Christian religious organisation to feel comfortable in bed with.
But purely from a design point of view I think the first two work better visually. I like.
Here come the 'bible-basher' bashers ....
- SkyPoo is an anagram by the way.SkyPoo
- an anagrammeJnr_Madison
- did u get banned again tim or just lose ur password?ian