rebranding Playboy

Out of context: Reply #25

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 56 Responses
  • mg330

    I read that blog everyday and followed this with much interest. That said, he may as well have just started a new magazine.

    Taking nudity completely out of that magazine changes the magazine 1,000,000% over. It's illogical.

    tigerlou - I fully respect that it's a student project, but as a professor grading this, I would have to say that it missed the mark. The execution is fantastic, the quality of the work is great. It had tons of work put into it. But you don't completely change a magazine like Playboy in the way this was done.

    Not only that, but the guy missed a great opportunity to work with nudity and shove it down people's throats as part of the project. What college kid chooses to NOT do that when presented with the opportunity :D

    mg33 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • I agree, it would be a cool icon/brand for a competing magazine, but remove the nudity and it's useless._niko
    • What college kid chooses to NOT do that when presented with the opportunity"
      One that doesn't want to look like every other college kid...      tigerlou
    • HEY LOOK GUYS, MG33 IS NOT A FUCKIN RETARDED LIKE U.dMullins
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread