rebranding Playboy
Out of context: Reply #33
- Started
- Last post
- 56 Responses
- Khurram0
you're arguing about the "nudity"??
d00d, the d00d explained WHY he wanted to get away from it. He SAID Playboy used to be a highly sophisticated intellectual magazine attracting the BEST writers of the English language.
He also explained that the nudity, once upon a time, was radical - but nowadays every lads mag is a fucking titties magazine.
He said he wanted to bring it back to when you COULD say "i read it for the articles" and it wasn't a joke.
And yeah, the bunny used to be quite classy, but with every coke whore stripper with that shit blazoned on her arse, you can hardly say this. But relatively yes.
Whatever, he went for this approach and that was HIS decision.
He wanted to redo the logo and i think, apart from that throbbing hard cock right in the middle, he hit the mark quite well.
The fox is still sensual/sexual and has that sophisticated gentlemans connotation that i'm sure that bunny represented once upon a time.