FLAC vs 320 kbps
FLAC vs 320 kbps
Out of context: Reply #3
- Started
- Last post
- 13 Responses
- d_rek0
The only problem with FLAC is that it's still not as widely supported as i'd like. Example: iTunes. For iTunes you must use a third party app to enjoy FLAC audio. However, listening to FLAC audio through items is buggy and the amount of memory that it consumes is disconcerting.
The other problem with FLAC, and you may not really have much of a problem with this, is that it takes up more space than compressed music. For me personally it's not much o an issue since I have hundreds of gigabytes of available freespace on my music hdd's.
Still.. after all is said and done i'd much rather enjoy music the way it was intended to be enjoyed: clean, crisp and without compression.