Wedding Photography
Wedding Photography
Out of context: Reply #6
- Started
- Last post
- 36 Responses
- mg330
I see it like this: The guy is trying to make the case that anything other than film would result in lower quality, therefore, because he cares so much about quality, it requires a premium price. And that's fine.
But the fact is, dozens of photographers doing 100% digital could have also been found that would probably satisfy them just as much and cost them less. My feeling is that this guy saw an opportunity to maximize his return - which is also fine - but I'd be interested to know if he did that by stating untrue things about digital format.