religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #489
- Started
- Last post
- 3,180 Responses
- hereswhatidid0
The problem with the religious zealots like yuri is that they simply can't comprehend not having some kind of faith system. It's beyond them to understand that, as an atheist, the notion of faith doesn't apply. They simply make the false assumption that believing in observable, scientific evidence is our religion and that we blindly follow it. I'd gladly believe in a creator if, as scarabin pointed out, you could provide some solid evidence. Not this "we only observe .0000008 of everything" metaphysical bullshit.
- lol. geeze. 1.you dont know if i have religion or not. 2. 000 what ever # is done by a scientist, mathematician not a metaphysics guy.yurimon
- Being taught since infancy that there is a supreme being affects one's ability to see things otherwise.ZOOP
- not a metaphysics person. Faith " firm belief in something for which there is no proof"yurimon
- so, you can't prove a god or disprove thus your choice of not believing in one is still faithyurimon
- Only thing that would make it fact is if god does not exist if there was a scientific law. however there is non. thusyurimon
- it is a firm belief in something for which there is no proof ei faith.yurimon
- So far it seems that people coming out of the wood work have a firm belief.yurimon
- I can't believe you're still stuck on the idea that scientists operate on faith or belief. we've covered this alreadyscarabin
- it seems to be your only argument and it doesn't even work because it's not the casescarabin
- http://en.wikipedia.…hereswhatidid
- I'm not stuck on anything. you guys cant get over fact its faith by definition.yurimon
- LOL how can it be faith if you believe in nothing?pango
- i thought earth was flat because that's all we saw. but now we know earth is a sphere shape because new evidence surfaced.pango
- more people will believe god exist if there are any convincing evidence.pango
- i = we....pango