Guns?
Guns?
Out of context: Reply #3
- Started
- Last post
- 56 Responses
- detritus0
- Lower frame 22mm?maquito
- Does this imply that people who carry firearms are physically weak. If you lived in an area full of turmoil you would get the difference between beating someonegilgamush
- Up and fighting for your property and wellbeing. If only the police and army had guns we would all be potential victims of autocrats and despotsgilgamush
- You never have nor will need to fight for your property or well being. Nor would you need a gun. Only a scared bitch would think they need one.monospaced
- And if you have I apologize. Didn't realize things were so hard. Please explain if I an incorrect.monospaced
- And there I was thinking I'd posted a picture of some nerd showing off his ‘guns’.detritus
- That was obvious. The fact someone would feel his manhood is attacked by this is absolutely tucking hilarious though.monospaced
- nice little hate filled tantrum ben.you have the maturity of a twelve year oldgilgamush
- I don't think you understand what tantrum means.monospaced
- You must be the most insecure person if this image tipped you off. Me saying that isn't a tantrum. Your novel below does maybe though.monospaced
- you bore megilgamush
- Then ignore me.monospaced
- or you could stop behaving like a childgilgamush
- Not a single thing I said here was childish.monospaced
- name calling and naive platitudes are all you have to offer. pure childishnessgilgamush
- Name calling? That's all you buddy.monospaced
- "I know you are but what am I" yawn, grow up bengilgamush
- I didn't call you names.monospaced