Suggest a bad movie

Out of context: Reply #77

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 334 Responses
  • nb2

    What the hell, I watched this last night. Honestly, I have never been more bored watching a movie than I was during this. SO BORING. I can't believe it got good reviews. Someone please explain why this is popular, because I do not get it.

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ma…

    • i don't get it either. the original was 100x better. but i also think 99.9% of hollywood movies are just unwatchable shit these daysMilan
    • I will NOT even watch this Hollywood garbage on my Betamax!utopian
    • Just one question, were there any lady bits shown?_niko
    • Yes. Are you going to watch it now?pango
    • I have zero interest in this movieBen99
    • Watched it 3 times already. I find it really entertaining.pango
    • @pango, definetly!_niko
    • yes, this one SUCKED really, really bad.pr2
    • visually great, story was typical predictable Hollywood formulamoldero
    • Yeah this has 98%+ on Rotten Tomatoes. Critically acclaimed! What the hell. Aside from a few nice shots, it's almost entirely a giant pile of shit.nb
    • Completely agree. Everyone was saying it was great, but it seemed like a typical Hwood, predictable with little plotformed
    • This movie needs to be seen on a big screen.inv
    • This movie needs to be shown in prison.futurefood
    • I think some of you are overlooking how bad typical Hollywood actually is. This was an action movie, but well made and succeeded at what it set out to do.yuekit
    • "typical predictable Hollywood formula"? Not sure I agree with that. There was very little dialogue for a Hollywood flickIanbolton
    • But saying that, I did fall asleep in the cinema!Ianbolton
    • "Hollywood" lol. Look at the director's name. Look at the creative process. Try not to let your dismissiveness blind you to everything in the world.cannonball1978
    • Its shit. but popular because it ticks the right hollywood diversity boxes.Dillinger
    • Don't start with that diversity shit - only silly little boys use that argument.face_melter
    • There was no story and no explanation to who Charlese's character even was.bainbridge
    • I don't see this it as a typical Hollywood film. Still, that doesn't explain the critical acclaim. Are they comparing it to Hollywood action? If so, why?nb
    • How is it possible that critics unanimously love it, while a bunch of us think it's total trash? Are we missing something?nb
    • people running from explosions for an hour and some change. barely held my interestburd-turglar
    • well, I guess it's not for the weak, meek and feeble minded... It's definitely up there with the original, and no it's not a hollywood fanserving.ArchitectofFate
    • woah there skippy, not sure why you feel the need to get all defensive about it. you know what they say about opinions don't youburd-turglar
    • Ya fuck you guys. I love this movie :)pango
    • loved it. way better than the first onescarabin
    • this movie is so relevant for today. The bad dudes are ISIS running around in the desert looking to protect their oil and enslave women.hotroddy
    • Mad Max: Fury Road or There and Back Again.ETM
    • at least "there and back" in one movie instead of 3. like LOTR.pango
    • lolmoldero

View thread