Climate Change

Out of context: Reply #105

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 537 Responses
  • monoboy5

    "40% of the US does not see climate change as a problem since Christ is returning in a few decades."

    And Jesus said unto them...

    "Ya'll fucked that up something special Billybob, so amma gonna blast all ye highfalutin rich folks to hell and put the poor folks back in charge. Blessed are the meek 'n all."

    Which ironically isn't true, because religion is just a convenient form of people control derived and perpetuated by an educated wealthy elite.

    • AmenmoIdero
    • exactly why it's so scary who Trump is picking for his teammonospaced
    • I wonder if anyone on QBN is part of that 40% or not.monospaced
    • from what I gathered we have a few church goers here but their the smart ones, we have 2 from TX though that I'm not too sure aboutmoIdero
    • I guess that means the majority of americans accept that climate change is a problem (and that J's not on his way)Gnash
    • I still can't quite believe Pence is VP. He wants mothers of miscarriages to pay for foetus funerals. Vindictive insanity.monoboy
    • GOP = less government!
      Except for women, then the government's all up in that pussy
      moIdero
    • Conservative christians share similar views to conservative muslims. Peas in a pod.monoboy
    • so does the other 60% see it as a gov solvable problem like they have the powers of this jesus guy? they can stop change in its tracksdeathboy
    • FUCKING
      AMEN
      BRAH
      utopian
    • @deathboy, nobody's asking gov to solve it, but to continue to support and further it and not deny and halt it.monospaced
    • Lobbyists are asking gov for public funds so they have a campaign platform. and many of these politicians believe they can stop climate change.deathboy
    • i see a big lie. small governments rarely can get shit done, how do we expect world. no one can imagine the global economic impacts let alone try and create adeathboy
    • benchmark of progress.deathboy
    • nothing wrong with individuals practicing the three RRRs, i see vast unintended consequences, and 0 results from global policies, esp with no measure of successdeathboy
    • so far their measures of success look like business growth models. which pretty much makes sensedeathboy
    • Most gov/bis concerns are short-term. The concerns from scientists on global warming pre-date the 1960s. Going beyond economic cycles. Not about money for them.monoboy
    • It's not about solving world issues alone, it's about doing our part as a major contributor to the issue. It's about investing in things that ensure a future.monospaced
    • Yes, there have to be incentives to do this, unfortunately, but at the same time there is a lot of new gov-funded infrastructure that could take advantage too.monospaced
    • Setting the standard, being a good example of how to do these on a nation-wide level is a step toward stopping negative impacts to the climate we all share.monospaced
    • and how do we measure if what we are doing has any impact, and wether its worth the costs?deathboy
    • all the current billions spent so far on green technologies has bought us how many years? what is the goaldeathboy
    • https://67.media.tum…deathboy
    • ^ its like this guy just saying all i need is to get this header home. i think ppl are focused too much on blind hopedeathboy
    • how, what is the impact, problems, costs, and when u get him home than what. its just aspirational marketing, just waste less food it will help moredeathboy
    • A few decades?? Lol ffsfuturefood
    • Foam at the mouth as socialist progressives! Attack those that don't side with your group think! Get'em!Hayoth
    • climate models are a lot like wallstreet stock models to me, you can model and predict and see what happens with time. but if we are as significant as led todeathboy
    • believe than i see a large amount of volatility that likely will scrap any model. its interesting. id love to see data points around mayan devastationdeathboy
    • if there are multiple data spots dated back to the fall around the world. Curious if strong small changes can have huge effects globally balancing outdeathboy
    • all models and predictions... i guess thats the point. we think of science as the new religion. we have iphones so we must no all. have some skeptisismdeathboy
    • challenge stuff. Most published findings end up being false. Dont make the science into a false prophet or religion. Religion got popular because masses newdeathboy
    • no better. People who didnt know read/write would believe whatever anyone said that was a scholar and could read and write, bible first printed word.deathboy
    • there's plenty of parallels to science and religiondeathboy
    • @deathboy, just because you don't know exactly how it's measured doesn't mean it isn't by a plethora of climate scientists and tools worldwide, every momentmonospaced
    • and no, most published findings on the matter do NOT end up being falsemonospaced

View thread