religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #2048
- Started
- Last post
- 3,175 Responses
- monospaced8
- You are shit at critical thinking.
< Reductio ad absurdum.Morning_star - "You are shit at critical thinking."
~ believes in all knowing being in sky watching him masturbatemoldero - "You are shit at critical thinking."
really? REALLY?? R E A L L Y ? ?moldero - No i don't. You have no idea what i believe and it shows.Morning_star
- but Morning_star knows what everyone else believes.moldero
- No I don't. Why would you think that?Morning_star
- get to work manmoldero
- Sorry moldero, you've lost me here. Not going to bash mono, but morn_star's totally right here - <this is a vastness away from a critically-considere... responsedetritus
- Hey it’s just one example. The Catholic Church knee about its widespread practice for decades or centuries and covered it up.monospaced
- But the idea that atheists aren’t tolerant is equally as far from rational argument as this.monospaced
- Nobody is saying that. The premis here is that those with some kind of faith are more tolerant than those without faith. Simple.Morning_star
- Yes. This photo shows people of faith are more tolerant.pango
- So, having faith in supernatural beings makes someone more tolerant? Lol, that's some funny shit.monospaced
- It's almost like you've been shown some scientific truth but are refusing to acknowledge it because of your distorted beliefs. Have you heard...Morning_star
- ..this theory about a Flat Earth?Morning_star
- I am respectfully acknowledging this is roughly scientific. But this kid isn't a professor, his sample was miniscule, and he's Catholic.monospaced
- I am simply questioning this study in its isolation, proposing it might not be as concretely conclusive as you seem to be treating itmonospaced
- I don't think it's concrete, it needs to be replicated. However what it does use is the scientific method.Morning_star
- You are shit at critical thinking.