Sexual Harassment of the DAY
Out of context: Reply #233
- Started
- Last post
- 527 Responses
- _niko2
so a girl goes into her bosses office, short skirt, high heels, starts chatting and flirting, after a while says it's hot in there and unbuttons her blouse a bit, revealing cleavage and some of her bra, the boss is a little put off but continues the conversation, then she proceeds to cross and uncross her legs 'accidentally" giving him a glimpse of her freshly shaved pussy (she also accidentally forgot to wear panties today) now he's stumbling on his words and clearly thrown off, she then start licking her pen slowly taking it in and out of her mouth in a provocative manner, all the while locking eyes with him.
The Boss can't control himself at this point and proceeds to have passionate sex with her.
The next day he's arrested for rape.
She never verbally consented.
She was powerless to say NO because of the power dynamics.
Dressing a certain way isn't an invitation to sex.
Being in a hot office and loosening clothing isn't an invitation to sex.
Crossing and uncrossing legs is in an uncomfortable chair isn't an invite.
neither is personal grooming habits or choice of undergarments.
and having a nervous habit of sucking on pen's is also not an invite.So who's right in this situation?
- one isn't forced to have sex with all who may show interest. boss should have passed. he should be fired for doing so.Gnash
- considering this situation would never happen, I'd say she's right to press charges if he raped hermonospaced
- "and proceeds to have passionate sex with her" There's a lot of missing story here. Cannot answer.SteveJobs
- he should go self rape himself in the bathroom insteadGuyFawkes
- was her intention to get him fired? if so morally she is wrong for deception BUT he should not have gone through with thatmugwart
- He should have fired her for exposing herselfcannonball1978
- it's rape...
... btw... thanks for the bonerPonyBoy - lol boss right :) this isn't so complicated, just be a fucking man and recognize the situation. this way you're just a piece of shit who fucks everything.sted
- and you deserve to lose.sted
- Ok, now let’s take the exact first part of the situation but let’s change the ending. The girl doesn’t go to the police but instead writes a blog titled hottest_niko
- Sex of my life and recounts the encounter with her boss. Anonymously.
They never have a repeat encounter but she will always cherish this memory._niko - Now, given that the situation and the act haven’t changed, only the girl’s perception or reaction to it after the fact, does it change anything?_niko
- Is it both rape and not rape until the girl decides what it is?_niko
- And I hope that I’m not coming across like I’m insinuating anything lol, it’s just a thought exercise_niko
- Sex in the office is always wrong. Fucking your employees is always a bad idea. And inter office relationships are dangerous -- just in case you were confused.shellie
- That's an easy lawsuit to avoid. Even in this fictional situation where she was egging him on, he should know better. He's her boss. This only happens in porn.shellie
- Are you really this dumb? This is a man's mythology of what actually happens.monkeyshine
- Interesting. So if the power dynamics were different, say they were neighbors, then this is ok? Is that what it hinges on?_niko
- Monkey shine, just a thought exercise, reverse genders if you like. Happens plenty of times the other way around too._niko
- Or these are both females or both males. Same situation no boss so remove power dynamic. Act happens as before. Scenario 1 rape is claimed, scenario 2 it is not_niko
- Does one person’s perception of the act change the act itself? Is egging someone on a green light for rape?_niko
- Scenario 1 boss is morally and legally guilty.
Scenario 2 the boss is morally but not legally guilty_niko - With no boss dynamic
Scenario1 morally and legally guilty?
Scenario2 morally and legally innocent?
Only determining factor being how one party acted afterwar_niko - With the boss dynamic, both are wrong morally and legally per American HR laws. Without the boss dynamic, he should definately get a clear go ahead, becauseshellie
- Non verbal concent is not sideways consent. It might not be concent at all. And if he's married or she's married, that's adultery, such can make you civillyshellie
- liable in some states. It's not that hard to cover your ass.shellie
- Typos. Sorry guys.*Non verbal concent is not always consent *if he's married or she's married, that's adultery, which can make you civilly liable in some statesshellie
- By changing the "ending" of your story, you are in fact changing the whole story. 1 she consented, 2 she didn't.dyspl
- You assume her decision afterward change the outcome, whereas the difference was really during the act itself.dyspl
- You simply outlined pure fiction, where a woman is raped, and still insist on asking who’s “right” here. She was raped.monospaced