Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #4591

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • renderedred1

    what if mRNA vaccine has an 0.5% mortality rate or some sort of immune system going haywire thing in 5-10 years. would you take it?

    discuss...

    renderedred 1Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • lolmonospaced
    • laugh all you want mono, we'll see in 5-10 years...renderedred
    • i am not anti-science, the opposite, but i will not be a test subject in a huge live experiment. when i can choose a vaccine i'll get one.renderedred
    • what does 5-10 years have to do with anything besides your wild imagination?monospaced
    • yeah, but... how do we really know it's not going to give us Autism either!!Ianbolton
    • it's not my imagination, it's facts mono, mRNA vaccines were NEVER tested on a controlled group. we DON'T know what can happen, that is all.renderedred
    • we DON'T know anything about long-term, not even if it works more than a few monthsrenderedred
    • and finally the super dooper pfizer vaccine is ineffective against the SA strain, that we know already. so yeah, go get it...renderedred
    • @ian we don't know. imagine it has genetic effects on your offspring for example. will you take the risk? even a small one like 0.5% of cases?renderedred
    • If mRNA turns even one person into a zombie we're doomed! It's just not worth the risk!i_monk
    • i would totally go for it if there was research and transparent stats on people getting the mRNA vaccine before 2010, and there isn't.renderedred
    • so if we don't know anything, why are you concerned about 5-10 years later? No study has indicated that would be an issuemonospaced
    • you're still 100% imagining and fabricating a what if out of thin air, and then acting like it's a valid concernmonospaced
    • the reason it hasn't rolled out in a control group until 2020 was NOT because there were reasons to be worried dudemonospaced
    • i get your point, still i'm a skeptic by nature ;)renderedred
    • the moment sputnik 5 (an old-school dormant virus) is available in my parts that one i'll take. that tech worked for a long time successfully.renderedred
    • I will still be waiting for a while to get one and see how things are going in a few months.. but J&J is not an mRNA vaccine.slinky
    • @renderererered - I don't disagree with you. You're right to be sus. OTOH, my partner was laid out for 36 hours after her 'traditional' AZ jab.Nairn
    • What if it gives us photographic memory and triple sensitive genitals?Akagiyama
    • It can be a valid concern it's imagined because there are still risks of unknown unknowns.cannonball1978
    • Well sure. Space might be filled with space dragons and there might be a monster under the bed.monospaced
    • @nairn AZ vaccine is also the messenger onerenderedred
    • No, it's not.Nairn
    • i just read about it it uses a DNA strain instead of RNA within an adenovirus.renderedred
    • "The Oxford-AstraZeneca vaccine is based on the virus’s genetic instructions for building the spike protein. But unlike the Pfizer-BioNTech and Moderna vaccinesrenderedred
    • which store the instructions in single-stranded RNA, the Oxford vaccine uses double-stranded DNA."renderedred
    • https://www.nytimes.…renderedred
    • read my man, get informed...renderedred
    • Your article lliterally states bluntly that the AZ vaccine uses DNA and not messenger RNA. Pull your head out of your ass.Nairn
    • Oh, I see - I misstated the AZ one as 'traditional' earlier. Not sure why i said that. Drunk, likely.Nairn
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread