Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #4597

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • omahadesigns-1

    If the J&J vaccine isn't as effective, why is it an option?

    Why can't they just manufacture the other two instead?

    omahadesigns -1Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • J&J is easier to produce fastergrafician
    • It's totally effective. 75% is really good for a vaccine. A standard flu shot between 40-70.FNP14
    • There isn’t enough of any one vaccine. And it’s effective at reducing hospitalization - if one does get COVID, it’s not as severeGnash
    • and maybe the logistics are also easier?grafician
    • I assure you that the poor American communities will be given the "Bobo Shot" aka J&J vaccine.utopian
    • 60% is better than 0%.uan
    • It's only one shot vs two. Plus it can be stored in regular refrigerators instead of sub freezersakiersky
    • They were tested at different stages of the pandemic, so the % effectiveness is not on the same scalerobotinc
    • it's because it's a different approach entirelymonospaced
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread