Euro 2020/1

Out of context: Reply #110

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 230 Responses
  • Beeswax0

    Kane's position in the first half could easily be a penalty too. Denmark didn't do anything for the whole 100 minutes.
    I'm tired of watching under achievers defending with 11 men winning with penalties like Italy yesterday.

    Penalty is fair.
    Remember the great upset of 2004.
    Why did Denmark played anti-football if they could take risks after falling behind?

    Beeswax 0Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • Penalty is fair because you are tired of warching «under achievers»?inv
    • Denmark winning in penalty shootouts would be more undeserved than a questionable penalty.Beeswax
    • < I'm tired of reading such cuck bullshitbabydick
    • Every team plays with what they have and if they have to defend to win because the other team is stronger they have the right to do so and it's the game.oey_oey
    • anti-football? its not like the brits were too glamouros during the whole tournament either ..at least from what i have heard.neverscared
    • England played better but a team has to make it by themselves and not receive a gift just because they deserve it as they're doing better.oey_oey
    • I understand you to a point but under achievers are part of the game and you need both teams and the ball is round. every game is a game. why play then?oey_oey
    • Denmark's first direct free-kick goal of the tournament was so anti-football.babydick
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread