Work for FREE! (I suck at design!)

Out of context: Reply #25

• Started
• Last post
• 35 Responses

• sarahfailin0

  OK! so here's the new design, polishing up what ben started with the feed back from the QBmittee. This first one is my preferred design...
  

  

  this second one has a little bit thicker electron tail.
  

  

  The nucleus of the atom is centered within the circular stroke of the electron tail, rather than centered between the bottom of the electron and the stroke, which makes the nucleus seem a smidge high to me. But I don't really like it when it's not in the center of the circle, so I guess I'm keeping it here.

  Any thoughts?

  sarahfailin 0Permalink

  UpvoteDownvote

  Flag

  • #2) When the logo is reduced in size the electron will read better.utopian
  • I think separating the electron/atom from the wordmark is a good move. The tail looks slightly blueish as it fades.BaskerviIle
  • Next I'd suggest you start using the logo to mockup real world applications to see it in situ. This well help you test if it really holds up at different scalesBaskerviIle
  • Not sure how you plan to use it (twitter profile pic, posters, banners?). Also, if you were referring to me, my names' not Ben :)BaskerviIle
  • dude! i'm so sorry. somehow I read your name and thought it was Benn! Thanks so much for helping me on this!sarahfailin
  • And I did leave the electron trail slightly blue... Idk I kind of like secret color in it. maybe it's not a good idea?sarahfailin
  • Ha, no worries. Keep us posted. Want to see where you end up taking thisBaskerviIle
  • So Baskerville is Bennn?utopian

  Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note

  SaveCancel

View thread