Work for FREE! (I suck at design!)
Work for FREE! (I suck at design!)
Out of context: Reply #33
- Started
- Last post
- 35 Responses
- sarahfailin-3
- Final version?
i really appreciate y'alls feedback and attention on all this. we're a rinkydink nonprofit with barely a thousand dollars to our name currently, and so this means a lot for us. I think we're doing better with this than a lot of groups do with similar resources (or even more resources...).
The interest and slight ability I may have in design is seriously because of you all and what I've gleaned from all the lovely content, crass opinions, and random bullshit shared on this forum. Seems like maybe I'm the only one on here who's not a real designer of some kind, but for better or worse I can say I was educated on QBN.
- hmm, seeing it here i think the kerning needs a little work. i really want those I's to be stacked. should i give up on that?sarahfailin
- It’s always nice when those little details can workGnash
- Oh my eyes
kerning much!
And the name is too fucking long man, plus staked like that looks busygrafician - This version was good, just needed a bit of kerning work
https://imgur.com/zS…grafician - Don't forget to evaluate how friendly this will be small screen/favicon/onlin... use, and create the necessary versions.evilpeacock
- @graf, I also like the vertical one, but don't you think I need a horizontal version? Isn't it typical to have multiple versions?sarahfailin
- the name isn't gonna change, y'all. sorry we didn't consider graphic design when choosing our name...sarahfailin
- Yeah, well, you can still short it "The Curiosity Co." maybe?
And yes, the symbol is top, I think it works very well!grafician - Not sure I understand your meaning here. Shouldn't I have a horizontal AND a vertical orientation for our logo?sarahfailin
- I posted 2 versions, horizontal and vertical lockupsgrafician
- Yes, you should have a "stacked" and horizontal treatment. you can also do abbreviated versions based on the "bug".evilpeacock