Coronavirus

Out of context: Reply #5471

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 6,399 Responses
  • pr2-3

    https://www.poverty-action.org/s…

    Large study involving 342k individuals.
    Who ended up with COVID?
    7.62% (13,273 out of 178,288) of masked group
    8.62% (13,893 out of 163,838) of control group

    What's most fascinating is that masks work only in reducing the virus presence in 50+yo individuals. Anyone below 50, the reduction is not statistically significant. (pg28)

    The study is yet another thorn to the side of those who sit in the own diarrhea of fear.

    BTW, the study was paid for by pro-maskers, so despite the above numbers, they still conclude that mask work...

    • “ We only increased mask wearing by 29 percentage points. With higher rates of masking, we may have seen a larger effect. ”inteliboy
    • Did you get your 6G upgrade yet?utopian
    • "may have" means absolutely nothing to me anymore. deal with REAL data and real numbers not "may have" you pull from someones ass.pr2
    • I'm missing the part where they conclude masks hurt kidsrobotinc
    • you are missing the part on page 28 that says there is ZERO difference in infections of kids.pr2
    • So the masks help the most at risk. That’s a good thing asshole.monospaced
    • those who are not at risk, don't benefit from wearing one. how dumb can you be not to see it?pr2
    • pr2 cracks me up on how he consistently misses the fuckin pointGuyFawkes
    • keep it coming, shit is hilariousGuyFawkes
    • Holy shit. Everyone sees it but you. Those not at risk wear a mask so they don’t spread it to those who are. You stupid fuck.monospaced
    • Do these knuckle dragging morons really think the mask only protects them!? So fucking moronic.monospaced
    • It’s not about fear you fucking idiot. It’s about saving lives. Only people scared are the fucktarfs like you who think the mask is dangerous. Idiot.monospaced
    • What the fuck are you so scared of that you won’t get vaccinated or mask up? You goddamned pussy ass bitch. Man up you lowlife piece of shit.monospaced
    • that's why you don't dispense science to people with petty brains. the numbers are just too complex for them to make any sense.pr2
    • the number clearly show something significant and yet they still go into their belief system of do-good by saving others with their false science.pr2
    • it's not false science, it is the primary science from the experts being adopted by all responsible goverments and companies on the planetmonospaced
    • and "do good by saving others" is a good thing, not a bad thing.monospaced
    • it IS a good thing if the actions actually have any tangible results. the data shows that in under 50 there is NONE.pr2

View thread