Coronavirus
Coronavirus
Out of context: Reply #5472
- Started
- Last post
- 6,399 Responses
- inteliboy0
^
“ The interventions tripled the proportion of people who wore masks correctly. Overall, in the villages where the team distributed masks, symptomatic infections were 9.3% lower. Where surgical masks were given out, the results were even better: infections dropped by 11%. Older people benefited most: symptomatic COVID-19 in people over 60 went down by 35% in the villages using surgical masks.”
Pr2 if in public and you’re in close porximity with someone with a cold, a flu or covid... and they are sniffling and coughing. Would you not prefer them to be masked up? People are filthy. Masks are just one aspect of attempting to control a pandemic.
- young and middle-age people saw no benefit what-so-ever.pr2
- Sure, but they wore masks and it helped those people who could be helped ffs. How do you not understand?monospaced
- this is YOUR conclusion and you have ZERO factual evidence to support it.pr2
- Sure I do. Masks work at slowing spread of virus via airborn particles. It’s the conclusion of every nation and company on the planet. Are you blind?monospaced
- The evidence is in the study you yourself linked to. It's as if you stubbornly read and hear only what you want to believe, no matter what is in front you.inteliboy
- ZERO science on your part to support your religious beliefs.pr2
- there was NO STATISTICAL DIFFERENCE in people under 50. page 28 you dummies.pr2
- first of all, yes, there was a difference, and second, it's you who is the dummie for not understanding that people over 50 actually mattermonospaced
- learn to read yo, page 28.pr2