Artificial Intelligence

Out of context: Reply #166

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,313 Responses
  • scarabin1

    • HopiumAQUTE
    • Yeah, then companies buy the tech and they don't have to fear the artists.garbage
    • Because artists are providing scripts and feedback for the GANs. I've been heckled for saying this but the A stands for "adversarial".garbage
    • Designers will be as obsolete as coal miners in our lifetimes. Every actually talented person that roams around here will be nullified in their lifetimes.garbage
    • lol whatgrafician
    • Seriously looking at Plumbing courses.shapesalad
    • yes, garbage. 1000% agree. It will happen.futurefood
    • needs regulation...problem fixedneverscared
    • i can't wait to see AI-click-kiddies showing up with a portfolio they didn't actually make trying to hold down a job with skills they don't posessscarabin
    • AI is just a tool, it will always require a wrangler. art directors who know their stuff. humans with a concept and a strategyscarabin
    • ^ That's kind of my point. Right now it just needs people to write it. But the more input that's added is to build the discriminative network..garbage
    • ..the less human input will be required. There will be a period where talented people are the directors, but all of their input will be cataloged.garbage
    • "They" said television would kill cinema, back in the 80s. Doom and gloomers seriously under-rate the value of human relationships in business.toemaas
    • Besides, what business owner is going to have time or the patience to deal with this bullshit to re-brand their company's identitytoemaas
    • Like scrolling through streaming platforms, with 1000s of choices, but no clear direction of what you actually want.toemaas

View thread