Artificial Intelligence

Out of context: Reply #803

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,378 Responses
  • neverscared0

    The Andy Warhol Copyright Case That Could Transform Generative AI
    The US Supreme Court’s upcoming decision could shift the interpretation of fair use law—and all the people, and tools, that turn to it for protection.

    Currently a trio of artists is suing Midjourney, Stable Diffusion maker Stability AI, and DeviantArt, claiming that the tools are scraping artists’ work to train their models without permission. Last week, all three companies filed motions to dismiss, claiming that AI-generated images bear little resemblance to the works they're trained on and that the artists didn't specify which works were infringed. The artists are being represented by Matthew Butterick and the Joseph Saveri Law Firm, which also filed a class action against OpenAI, GitHub, and GitHub’s parent company Microsoft for allegedly violating the copyrights of coders whose work was used to train the Copilot programming AI, part of the “no-code ecosystem.” Getty Images filed a suit in January against Stability AI claiming “brazen infringement” of its image licensing catalog.

    https://www.wired.co.uk/article/…

    • Andy Warhol? Who used peoples photos and artwork without permission and became a multi-millionaire?PhanLo

View thread