religion

Out of context: Reply #2914

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 3,175 Responses
  • utopian9

    • Well, colonizer Jesus wondrgs
    • He only won because his daddy was a fraud.monospaced
    • nepo baby!pango
    • nepo baby zombie death cultmonospaced
    • eat his flesh, drink his blood, gaze upon his body nailed to a cross, and worship him or else this asshole will torture you for eternity, because he loves you.monospaced
    • literally makes no sensemonospaced
    • David O'Doherty?MrT
    • no solid "historical" Jesus though outside of obscure referencesinteliboy
    • LolGnash
    • Good thing the historical existence of Jesus has no bearing whatsoever on any of the supernatural claims surrounding him.monospaced
    • There absolutely is a secular scholarly consensus on his historicity.garbage
    • White Jesus is also real: He lives in the hearts of believers and makes them pay rent..garbage
    • ..and lives rent-free in the minds of people who've never passed grade-school atheism.garbage
    • I don't see how they can be so sure he was real just because there are a handful of references in other texts.yuekit
    • My guess would be he was a real person but there's a weird disconnect between the claims there's a consensus and what the actual evidence is.yuekit
    • Dat5timuli
    • @yue Full disclosure: I'm an atheist that studied theology and almost went into the ministry when I was young.garbage
    • There's way more than a handful of evidence there was a historical Jesus (or even multiple people). But the Christian religion has had two millennia to..garbage
    • ..write whatever narrative they want, and so much was lost in translation. Even the "Joshua" in this image is wrong.garbage
    • I can bore the hell out of you with Jesus, lol.garbage
    • I go to church for my wife, last time I just stared at the cross thinking, "dang, who is this white guy, I feel sorry for him, accused of crimes he ddnt commit.canoe
    • @garbage You're probably right then...I do wonder how accurate the details people repeat about him are.yuekit
    • Do you think Jesus himself claimed to be the son of god or was all of that embellished after the fact?yuekit
    • That's where things get really fucking muddy. From what I know, he was essentially a very charismatic cult leader that upset the ruling religious ruling class..garbage
    • ..the Pharisees were planning on kidnapping and killing him silently for a bit, but then saw Judas, and how cheaply he could be bought off.garbage
    • So they essentially sold Jesus to the Romans, gaining favor with them and making an example of a cult leader in one swoop.garbage
    • He preached some good things, but yeah probably also thought he was the son of God.garbage
    • The Gospel of Mark, which is the foundation of the New Testament was written 70 years after his death. Just imagine the holy phone game happening there.garbage
    • But there are plenty of contemporary texts that revere him. Many Islamic denominations consider Isa / Jesus the final prophet, but not the son of god.garbage
    • But yeah, end religious rant because I could go on for boring day after day.garbage
    • Yeah interesting thanks! I think it shows the degree of Christian influence on society that even non-religious people tend to automatically assume Jesus was ayuekit
    • good person. A lot of ideas attributed to him are positive but if you look at the basic personality type, it would probably be someone like Joseph Smith oryuekit
    • David Koresh. But you almost never hear that discussed, it's like a black pill that would too upsetting for Western society to consider.yuekit
    • But like you said it's like a game of telephone. It could also be that his followers embellished all of that.yuekit
    • I believe he was real. I just don't believe he was anything but a man.monospaced
    • you dont believe he could do Criss Angel
      shit and walk on water?!?!?!
      pango
    • blasphemy!!pango

View thread