Artificial Intelligence

Out of context: Reply #1021

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,322 Responses
  • neverscared4

    • big boy compannies will make big boy gains..neverscared
    • Then maybe they could invest those gainz$ in good stories and scripts. Cuz all the past 10 years have been shit from Pixar and DreamworksNBQ00
    • The last really good ones have been Ratatouille, Wall-E & Up. Which is from over 10 years agoNBQ00
    • I need to look for a new job then...ApeRobot
    • this dude once said "3D in movie theaters was the greatest innovation in movies since color" direct quotejonny_quest_lives
    • then there was his $1.75 biliiion Quibi failurejonny_quest_lives
    • Former anti-worker CEO says anti-worker things. Another day in Hollywood.jonny_quest_lives
    • It's hilarious to read boomers like this guy commenting with such certainty about how AI will change the world.yuekit
    • BTW if you reduce the resources and money needed by over 90% why do we need Pixar?yuekit
    • Katz outta tha bagstoplying
    • Animation Studios over the last 20 years: "We've outsourced so much of our workflow overseas but now those workers want a living wage too"jonny_quest_lives
    • Jeffrey Katzenberger (whose last animation credit was as a producer on Shark Tale in 2006): "AI"jonny_quest_lives
    • He's not wrong, though. AI is already wiping out industries left and right and it's just started. Those at the top are drooling.formed
    • It's not going to wipe this industry out - the studios want to make a fucking feature every 6 weeks. This will help them fill in that 90% need for slave labortoemaas
    • An AI still can't consistently do a good style. The Spiderverse was artist led and better than anything Marvel or Star Wars has done for 20 yearsPhanLo
    • Like I said months ago....your days are numbered as a traditional artist/designer.utopian
    • Having worked with agencies and film makers, marketing folk, none of them want to do the creative. They want to get the audi money and do gear.PhanLo
    • I really embraced AI, but I still think human led storytelling is better. Big studios are already making shit movies without AI and I reckon it'll get worse.PhanLo
    • AI is for people who never managed to get some deep design skills anyway.... they have to polish their average or below standard up and think they can shine andneverscared
    • sell it fru a book or online...a very very rare amount will be able to do that... the rest will lose their job and have to go into healthcare or sth similarneverscared
    • Sucks as artist because making art drives is. Corporate types don’t dive two shits about art, only profit. We can easily do what they do and make a buck_niko
    • ...but it just doesn’t sit well. Greedy talentless cunts._niko
    • Katzenberg was never a thought leader by any means he was and probably still is mediocre C-suite skinwalker whose ego derailed his chances of running Disneyjonny_quest_lives
    • Just gonna say that as a 1099 bro, the AI concerns and talks about UBI have been going on for over a decade.garbage
    • Any of you that think you can't be replaced better be friends with your boss. It doesn't matter how hot your shit is.garbage
    • Adobe has seen it and will soon be selling you. Sensei, baybay. Also halfcoding has been a thing for maybe 5 years.garbage
    • I think the issue is that yes...AI can spit out nice looking images, it can write code etc. But there's a lot more to completing a project from start to finish.yuekit
    • It requires an overall vision, knowing the technical details of what you want to build, putting all the pieces together. AI typically follows a formula,yuekit
    • real-world projects often don't. I haven't seen the evidence that a single AI can completely replace a designer or developer, or that it will anytime soon.yuekit
    • Even if you could get the AI to do everything, just the process of communicating what you wanted to create would be somewhat complicated.yuekit

View thread