religion
religion
Out of context: Reply #3073
- Started
- Last post
- 3,175 Responses
- whatthefunk7
- It's not as simple as 'my body, my choice' The debate is a human rights issue but there's potentially more than one human to consider. There's no simple answer.Morning_star
- I like this "it's not a debate" angle. I'm going to start using it at home.
And please save your comments, it's not a debate.palimpsest - mornings mindset on the optimum trajectory towards the handmaidens tale society... "there is no simple answer" the ultimate empty phrase..neverscared
- It's not a debate.palimpsest
- hate speech on plattforms is groovy.. bodily autonomy sucks... it´s not a debate... welcome to the dark....neverscared
- Nope. Never said that. You're doing that obtuse fantasist thing again.Morning_star
- you made your fantasies in the first statement very clearly... doesn´t get more primitive than that....neverscared
- Primitive? how so.Morning_star
- Are we having a debate?palimpsest
- it nicely shows how primitive your primitiveness is....your anger against women starts by doubting their bodily autonomy as in no simple answer...neverscared
- but i´am confident it was just a rhetorical question and you are playing dumbo boy....neverscared
- The lady said there's no debate. Why are we having a debate?palimpsest
- Haha, you really want a debate don't you?!! Religion - It's not a debate TMIanbolton
- @neverscared What Anger? When did i doubt their bodily autonomy? As I said, you're not only a fantasist but also delusional. I believe you may actually...Morning_star
- ...be Colin Robinson.Morning_star
- your body autonomy starts with keeping your legs closed and reading a pamphlet that stays that making babies is a real consequence of sex.pr2
- "Consequence of sex"? Lol, you worried that those stacks of witch burning stakes in your basement are getting too moldy to use?garbage
- its not as simple as my choise my body... that´s clear doubting bodily autonomy... i think u have alzheimer and forgot that line.neverscared
- but u doubted right there on the top first statement like a primitive neanderhtaler...its really simple...u either think its their choice or not... evidently uneverscared
- r on the not side...neverscared
- and i of course it take a lot of hate towards women to not give them the simple.. their body their choice...neverscared
- folks like u will never take women for full and want to rule of their bodies...neverscared
- callilng me delusional while doubting- my body my choice- with saying its not that simple is as lunatic as it gets.neverscared
- in case you were oblivious to basics of reproduction, it takes two for a baby to start growing in woman's body.pr2
- the most you can milk from the body/choice statement is: her body, their choice.pr2
- it takes two to start.. .it takes one to finish.... so after the start u can fuck off and leave the woman alone with her choices and respect her...neverscared
- but u are so proud of your sperm ... you suckers are so brainless as sperm... that u want to control her pathetic ... also typical patriachy because inneverscared
- matriarchy it clear u can fuck off with your control of woman...... there are better man than yourself that know are in control of growing up the kid .. soneverscared
- leave the ladies alone if they dont fancy u convervatives patriachy driven suckers anyomore...neverscared
- ... the taliban boys pr2 and morning when it comes to downvalue women body autonomy...neverscared
- because it takes two to start, it takes two to decide to end it (via abortion). so again: her body, their choice.pr2
- you gotta embrace your manhood more, you will get laid more.pr2
- @neverscared I'm trying to be civil with you but you keep purposely distorting what i've said to meet your own preconceptions of what my position is. I'm...Morning_star
- ...confident enough in my views to be able to explore ideas and the subsequent nuances which i don't agree with, on a level that to you seem to think means i...Morning_star
- ...support them. You're are wrong.
Consider this: Is it ok for a woman to choose to abort her baby at 39 weeks?Morning_star - Should we consider the baby as a human at 39 weeks? in which case it has human rights, a well as the mother.Morning_star
- So who's human rights are violated at that point?Morning_star
- @Morning_star
Even if there's no debate to be had some people are actually listening.palimpsest - the dumbest question to ask when abortion timesframes are regulated by state which subscribes to human rights... u are slower than i thought...sorry, my mistakeneverscared
- Thank you for agreeing with me. As i said IN THE FIRST POST, it's not as simple as my body, my choice.Morning_star
- yes in your fantasyland civilisation where there is no regulation and context as in regulated u can always say its not that simple... but in the regulatedneverscared
- civilisation we are living in its still... my body my choice... is very easy and simple... if u wanna talk in an state without laws where u wanna set yourneverscared
- lunatic discussion in the first place its useless.. but iam not discussing crime here as u want to... which is a primitive thing as u proof to claim again.neverscared
- also this post from the lady is driven on religion .... so the taliban analogy with you 2 makes perfect sense.neverscared
- sure good idiotc fun scraping all current laws and the saying it not that simple...neverscared
- @NS you wrote..."but in the regulated civilisation we are living in its still... my body my choice" No it isn't. The 'civilization' as you call it takes that...Morning_star
- ...choice away from the woman under the eye of the states law.
I'd prefer it if you didn't fantasise about my political and religious perspectives as ...Morning_star - ...it's getting a bit weird.Morning_star
- ..but it is in her body. It's her choice. A dude can walk away from a hookup, a girl can't. It's pretty fucking simple.garbage
- @garbage I agree. It isn't as simple at the other end of things when we get closer to birth. As neverscared points out, most progressive countries that have...Morning_star
- ...legal abortion remove that legal right from the woman after about 20 weeks apart from certain edge circumstances. I agree with the sentiment of my body...Morning_star
- ...my choice but as i have pointed out repeatedly ,that isn't the case legally throughout the whole of the pregnancy.Morning_star
- its only getting wierd because u your primitve land stance.... free speech is still free spech although its regulated.. the same way your body your choice isneverscared
- is still your body your choice although is regulated... but when u are too slow to understand how terms get defined it proves your primitive state of mindneverscared
- thought patterns.neverscared
- evidently think modern civilisation take more away from women than give them and makes it less simple... which is horseshit when u look how women andneverscared
- their babies were valued before modern civilisation...neverscared
- Your claim that 'my body, my choice' and 'freedom of speech' are both conditional and dependant on YOUR definitions is delusional. The womans statement...Morning_star
- ...about 'bodily autonomy' cannot possibly be conditional and dependent as that would mean she would agree with those US states that have banned abortion....Morning_star
- the criminal view u project into the ladies statement that she wants to break the law shows your hate and distrust against women...neverscared
- ...Your argument is incoherent and illogical.Morning_star
- sure yes.. thats why tucker carlson lost his lawsuit and depp won his on defame... because we dont have freedom of speech and its not regulatedneverscared
- evidently u have no clue about civilisation building and how it operates...neverscared
- i agree it must seem delusional to you because u are not the brightest up there when it comes to the free intelligent world ...neverscared
- u don´t understand the logic of civili life and lawmaking for a civil life alltogheter...neverscared
- Is the woman's statement about bodily autonomy conditional?Morning_star