Artificial Intelligence

Out of context: Reply #1118

  • Started
  • Last post
  • 1,316 Responses
  • hydro743

    hydro74 3Permalink
    UpvoteDownvote
    Flag
    • oh really? fuck off.sted
    • that's basically admitting that they build a for profit business based on stolen data.
      every single person whose ip was used can sue them      sted
    • "Sue everybody" - Brett Weirutopian
    • evidently they should have waited t till the copyright laws are changed so that they can train their models... and not steal it all beforehand... fatalneverscared
    • and idiotic risk they took... lets hope they pay the proper price for it not being patient enuff and raid the scene like criminals..neverscared
    • sillicon valley boys are not above the law...neverscared
    • Why is this a photo of a screen?palimpsest
    • ^^ Dramatic effect..hydro74
    • It’s almost as if they’re gonna have to come up with a business plan, approaching content creators, publishers to license content first, crazy pffftprophetone
    • I love how they frame it as saving OpenAI is saving ai itself, no dudes you’ve been labouring under a strategy that you will simply get your wayprophetone
    • This is like saying I need the RIAA to allow me to sample Taylor Swift’s catalog for free in order to save the LP I already made that benefits me directlyprophetone
    • to save the music industryprophetone
    • Boycott ChatGPT.palimpsest
    • still dunno what chatgpt does well... i mean really. other than the twitter grifters who say it does everything i've found it to be consistently unreliable.jonny_quest_lives
    • maybe i underestimate the market for verbose incorrect answers.jonny_quest_lives
    • What did you ax it?palimpsest
    • so.. anyone here want my NFT's i made from some Promptshydro74
    • You bet, get’em minted and I’ll re mortgage my haciendaprophetone
    • iam gonna flippin sue hydro when he releases his next nft prompt...neverscared
    • i like chat-gpt but i mostly use it for SQL, Excel and Regular Expressions. i'm not sure why it's expected to write novels and draw pictures...kingsteven
    • ... because it can.palimpsest
    • it can also plagiarism check, more a comment about the irrelevancy of the lords question and response... the things it does well fall under transformative usekingsteven
    • or 'the things no one complains about' of course banning scraping is going to fuck AI research. the NYT case is about open AIs breach of established law.kingsteven
    • which would be fine if plagiarism wasn't their business model. surely all they have to do is link to their sources and its technically transformative, in thekingsteven
    • same way as the law protects search, and within the capabilities of the AIkingsteven
    • how do you expect ai to be anything without being trained on copyright?doesnotexist
    Show [[ numHiddenNotes ]] more notesAdd Note
    SaveCancel

View thread