Matrix Sequels were modified!?
- Started
- Last post
- 12 Responses
- dcdomain
http://navi.lpm-studio.com/media…
I had no idea this ever happened until today. So random... anyway, does that explain why the sequels sucked so much?
- dopepope0
doesn't say what she actually won tho. I'd like to know.
- gabriel20
seems like a big hoax to me. you'd think there'd be more than 1 article floating around the internet if this were true...
- whoohaa0
you've been punk'd
as you weren't
- dopepope0
woaw
- jackfoley0
Use the find button. This whole story is fake!
- dopepope0
there is no story.
damn that Ashton!
- dopepope0
I clicked on find and it said the story is fake.
- dcdomain0
DOH! I've been had... but again... why were the sequels so bad?! The stories coming from the fan boards when they were guessing at the storyline were LOADS better than the real thing.
- cinder0
the SUIT is NOT a hoax
Just the notion that the lawsuit has had any meaningful ruling yet.
- airey0
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The…
near the bottom of the page.
- r_gaberz0
this topic is so last month
- spongebob0
Sophia Stewart Legal Case
On October 4, 2004, a California court granted Sophia Stewart leave to continue her case against Warner Brothers and the Wachowski Brothers The case was filed by Stewart on April 24, 2003 Stewart claims that the story of the Matrix was based on a manuscript she wrote entitled "The Third Eye" which she allegedly submitted to the Wachowskis in response to an advert. Heavily-publicized accounts misreported the October 4th decision as Stewart winning her lawsuit, thus proving the misdeeds of Warner Brothers and the Wachowskis, rather than simply winning permission to continue with the case.