Fake war
- Started
- Last post
- 325 Responses
- Balance0
the 16 intelligence agencies that agree that the war in Iraq has increased terrorism will never hold a glass of water to the very fact that there hasn't been an attack on US soil since 9/11. I am sorry man, I really am. It sounds very exciting for you but the entire administration can say that side by side with France and it still would never change the fact that there has been ZERO attacks since 9/11. Sorry.
- mrdobolina0
what does that prove exactly?
- garett_west0
So you hate everything Bush and everything about and to do with his administration, you thought his intelligence then was full of shit (with the wmd in iraq), but now you take it as absolute truth.
Who can't have it both ways dobs?
You are the worst kind of hypocrite.
- mrdobolina0
is it not possible that there were no attacks because there were no attacks? Or is it because of iraq?
What automatically makes it: "due to the iraq war, our country has not been attacked"?
- mrdobolina0
stop being a bush apologist, for five seconds and just take things on their face value.
- Balance0
what does that prove exactly?
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:22)wow.
- Balance0
stop being a bush apologist, for five seconds and just take things on their face value.
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:24)wow.
- Balance0
is it not possible that there were no attacks because there were no attacks? Or is it because of iraq?
What automatically makes it: "due to the iraq war, our country has not been attacked"?
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:23)wow.
- Balance0
is it not possible that there were no attacks because there were no attacks? Or is it because of iraq?
What automatically makes it: "due to the iraq war, our country has not been attacked"?
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:23)wow.
- mrdobolina0
dont dodge it.
- Balance0
Come back to real life mrodobolina. You're still in theory. Take all of that anger, hatred and energy you put into blaming a president and instead use all of that energy and put it into a solid solution if you don't like the one that appears to be working.
- mrdobolina0
you act as if I am the only person in this country that has these views...
are 60 percent of american citizens unamerican in your estimation?
- Balance0
are 60 percent of american citizens unamerican in your estimation?
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:30)"unamerican"? Huh? Why would you assume or ask me that? Of course not.
- garett_west0
stop being a bush apologist, for five seconds and just take things on their face value.
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:24)A Bush apologist or am I trying to show you the light that any administration right now would be in the same boat, and, if you think the next lackey to come into office is going to clear this shit up within his first week your sadly mistaken and need to go back to living in your moms basement playing psp and dungeons and dragons cause you sir are not living in the real world where everything is Bush's fault and it will all be over when he's out of office.
THAT is the saddest part with you.
- mrdobolina0
the democrats had no desire to attack iraq.
it is well known that PNAC did.
Making fun of me does not make these facts go away. Also, I have never said that once bush is out of office everyhting will be better again.
Stop being such an asshole. Stay the course you stupid shit.
- Balance0
are 60 percent of american citizens unamerican in your estimation?
mrdobolina
(Sep 28 06, 07:30)Why would you ask me that? Are you eating another stereotype or is that referring to something I once said? See mrdobolina you can't even stay with facts when it comes to an online message board. You're still working with theories and assumptions based on stereotypes and other people’s opinions. We're talking about here and now. Real life world stuff. Come back.
- Bluejam0
the 16 intelligence agencies that agree that the war in Iraq has increased terrorism will never hold a glass of water to the very fact that there hasn't been an attack on US soil since 9/11.
Balance
(Sep 28 06, 07:21)2,600+ americans have been killed by 'terrorism' (in iraq). fuck knows how many casualities/ wounded..etc. their families probably couldn't give a damn whether it's on american soil or not.
so blow your trumpet armchair general.
- mrdobolina0
you have called me unamerican before, so has garett.
dont lie about it now.
now attack bluejam as hard as you are attacking me, you fucking half -wits.
- garett_west0
"the democrats had no desire to attack iraq."
Uh uh Rick, you're not getting away with your blatent lies this time.
"Why Congressional Democrats Support the War
by Jacob G. Hornberger, October 17, 2005Some people remain mystified as to why Hillary Clinton and other Democratic members of Congress have supported the invasion and occupation of Iraq.
What’s the mystery?
After the infamous WMDs that the United States provided Saddam during the 1980s unexpectedly failed to be found during President Bush’s invasion of Iraq in 2003, the president shifted his primary rationale for the war to helping the Iraqi people oust Saddam Hussein from office and bringing them “democracy.” ..."
And the vote..... don't even get me started on the actual vote Dobs. You sir are a liar, and you are trying to lie your way into making everyone believe you are right. Liar.
- garett_west0
The Senate early Friday voted 77-23 to authorize President Bush to attack Iraq if Saddam Hussein refuses to give up weapons of mass destruction as required by U.N. resolutions.
The House approved an identical resolution, 296-133.
The measure passed the Senate and House by wider margins than the 1991 resolution that empowered the current president's father to go to war to expel Iraq from Kuwait. That measure passed 250-183 in the House and 52-47 in the Senate.
The Senate vote sharply divided Democrats, with 29 voting for the measure and 21 against. All Republicans except Sen. Lincoln Chafee of Rhode Island voted for passage.
Those are facts RICK. MORE Democrats voted for it than those against it.
You can't get away with your lies anymore dude.