So it was Ryan Giggs all along!
- Started
- Last post
- 31 Responses
- BusterBoy0
Ryan who?
- auxillary0
IMHO: .... who fucking cares?
- set0
- calculator0
Shaming Ryan's Privates
- digdre0
first world problems.
- domacle0
Naming Private Ryan
- Jimbo820
This belongs in here...
- Projectile0
and by getting extra excited about it, we're all playing the game. In this case it's only her that needs to play it he's loaded enough I think.
Seriously who the fuck gives a fuck who fucks who in the what! Is there no real news happening? Hell I'll beat up a pensioner if it means the media will write about something real!
*thread bump
- set0
Haha what a stupid cunt. Shed not much better.
Fuck them all I say.
- liveforever0
in his defence..... she is so fuckin hot i dont blame him
- yeah that pic on page 1 is hawt.... i think we'd all hit it...BuddhaHat
- severian0
you people lead vapid lives.
- Dodecahedron0
I am of the opinion these sort of high profile privacy cases are intentionally trying to shake up the laws and publicise legal issues related to social media.
- off course man,
I and my friends really don't give a shit abou tthis whole issueGeorgesII
- off course man,
- kalkal0
The guy in the building (Parliament) outed his name because Ryan Giggs was attempting to sue the said Twitter user, despite that person not being a member of the press which these super injunctions are aimed at.
If he hadn't simply brought out the name, the said user would have been found and sued in secret.
- GeorgesII0
so the lad didn't want his name to come out because he dated a girl from big bro, then someone twittereded his name and a guy in some kinda building exposed the name of the guy to protect twitter users from a footballer?I still don't get it,
- Horp0
B-rett B-ash?
- Jimbo820
You know, Bart Bosh, the legend who's name we cannot speak on QBN