WTC memorial shit
Out of context: Reply #11
- Started
- Last post
- 12 Responses
- mbr0
I'll say it once and I'll say it again, if that 'Gaudi' rip off interpretation even got a slight chance of consideration, there would be a mass suicide in the architecture community, myself included. This is exactly why the 'public' do not make the decisions. Those that are knowledgable, educated, and informed should be, and mostly are, the ones making the decisions. Thank God.
You forget that there are parts of architecture that are fundamental to creating something good. It seems really hypocritical for people here to say, 'Yeah, I like that Gaudi rip-off (after all, the guy has been dead for a long time), but God forbid someone make a web site (which is a temporary thing with little to no significance to the world) that looks like 2 Advanced!"
I agree that the schemes were not great, but that one is horrible. Anyone consider the distance from the elevators to the windows? The penetration of light into the building? Safety and security? A big, fat building will not work as an office building.
Nobody thought of that, eh?