Darwinist
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- ********0
K0na you're missing the point! the male model issue, merely proposes that after the reduction of our environmental challenges evolution is currently being reversed. Really man, get with hte programme!
kelpie
(Jan 5 06, 07:48)Not sure what you are trying to say, but if you're saying anything bad about male models I'm going to have to break dance fight you until you die from it.
- shilohous0
"I love how these threads end up just being emotional shouting by those who don't like to hear about the glaring flaws in Darwinism."
yeah, creationism is a completely flawless fact-based lie
- mrdobolina0
written iranian history goes back 7500 years at least, how does that jive with the bible?
- ********0
the christian bible says that the earth is only a bit over 6,000 years old.
All scientists agree that the earth is older than that.
What gives?
mrdobolina
(Jan 5 06, 08:12)that definitely isn't something I believe in, it's older than 6K but I don't think they are on target with the Earth being 4.55 billion years (plus or minus about 1%)
- cosmo0
the christian bible says that the earth is only a bit over 6,000 years old.
All scientists agree that the earth is older than that.
What gives?
mrdobolina
(Jan 5 06, 08:12)does the bible mention dinosaurs? I could be wrong but as far as I know it doesn't.
That means dino bones have been planted by human beings for fun. :)
- -sputnik-0
kOna, may i recommend a "dance-off"?
- Mimio0
Whoah, Kuz got clipped.(again)
- -sputnik-0
is that what happened w/the count, mimio?
- cosmo0
poor kuz he angered the big Q again.
- ********0
Whoah, Kuz got clipped.(again)
Mimio
(Jan 5 06, 08:18)yeah he called JK a Right Wing something..
tisk tisk
- kelpie0
K0na you're missing the point! the male model issue, merely proposes that after the reduction of our environmental challenges evolution is currently being reversed. Really man, get with hte programme!
kelpie
(Jan 5 06, 07:48)Not sure what you are trying to say, but if you're saying anything bad about male models I'm going to have to break dance fight you until you die from it.
kOna
(Jan 5 06, 08:14)well prepare to bust a move you dog.
*does the unstopable pimp walk
- Baskerville0
kuz, I refuse to accept (macro) evolution because there is not a shred of scientific evidence to support it...
Nothing religious about that.
discipler
(Jan 5 06, 07:50)_____________________________
What I find strange is that a person who is obviously so caught up in his religious beliefs (I assume from the name discilper that he is religious) will on one hand believe in god with absolutely no evidence just blind faith to go on, but then on the other hand say (as above):
"I refuse to believe xyz because there is no proof to back it up"
must be strange to have such an inconsistent and illogical mind.
- mrdobolina0
that is almost poetic, how you put that baskerville.
- discipler0
Don't miss the irony, baskerville.
I believe in God/Jesus because of a bevy of historical, archaeological, and subjective-experience, evidence. Faith based in facts.
Darwinism, on the other hand, requires faith in the absence of facts. The evidence is sorely lacking.
It's not so illogical for me to have the views that I do. Actually, they are based on much study.
- KuzII0
what happened to all my posts????
- pavlovs_dog0
again, if discipler can justify this:
he can justfiy anything...
- ********0
Most people believed that the Earth™ was flat and the center of the universe for many many 100's of years, but got over it when they where proven wrong.
Many still believe God™ created the universe and everything in it, but will get over that too when proven wrong.
- Mimio0
I don't think Darwinian evolution requires faith at all. Evolution is a fact, macro-evolution just employs the same mechanisms in a larger unifying theory.
- mrdobolina0
how about 7500 years of written iranian history, discipler?
- kelpie0
discipler, your first reply to that point was seriously the stupidest fucking thing I have ever heard anyone attempt to pass off as an intelligent answer.