Casino Royale Title Seq.
- Started
- Last post
- 36 Responses
- CphGD
Do any of you know who made it and where I can see it?
Cheers
- Boikov0
Daniel Kleinman and... er... YouTube?
- CphGD0
Thanks a lot Boikov. I couldn't find it on YouTube. Do yo have a link?
- Engage0
i thought they were ace...only bit not so sure about was the tracing of bond himself... should of just kept him as a jagged silhouette too like at the end of them when he goes from photographic to black...
saw it last night... an actual proper film for once
- babaganush0
liked the boldness of the titles but didn't feel they quite worked. Loved the film.
- Jaline0
liked the boldness of the titles but didn't feel they quite worked. Loved the film.
babaganush
(Nov 24 06, 04:07)I agree, except I think they were quirky enough to be weird and cool. Just that the outline of Bond himself was a bit more strange than I would have liked. Still, the film itself was great and the titles were different enough to not be bad.
- trooperbill0
that blows - its the WORST bond titles EVER, completely un-sexy, looks like someones been playing with flash and after effects for a few hours - just PANTS
- Jaline0
what exactly do you mean by it being "un-sexy"?
- koolbavaria0
- Aaand sex ?
- Yes please !!YEAH BABY, YEAAAHH!
i thought the intro wasnt sexy either and they killed the aston too early , dang we didnt see one trick of the aston, besides they killed the gorgeous women too early and overall it was still great, much better than brosnans'
- Baskerville0
I like how this thread title is abbreviated to 'Re: Casino Royale Tit'
surely that injects some sex back into the titles?
- Jaline0
I could care less about the women being killed off since it had to do with the story. I'm looking at Bond most of the time anyway.
- paraselene0
it's true, young jaline has got much saucier in the past year!
- Jaline0
para agrees with me ;)
- CphGD0
Thanks for the comments guys, but does anybody know where I can see the title sequence without going to the movies? Please help...
- Jaline0
http://www.digitmag.co.uk/news/i…
http://commanderbond.net/article…"While some Bond fans may miss the girls from Casino Royale’s main title sequence, Kleinman hinted in a similar interview with the LA Times that they would be returning, saying: ‘By the end of this [film], 007 is more like the Bond we all know and love. So I think those dancing girls may well come back again.’"
- Jaline0
nice, Boikov. I thought that was just the part where he kills that guy in the beginning but I obviously didn't watch the whole thing.
To grab that video you can use:
http://www.keepvid.com/
- Geith0
was total rubbish. no bond girls? blah.
- Jaline0
I already posted why that is:
"Kleinman, who also designed the titles for Die Another Day, The World Is Not Enough, Tomorrow Never Dies, and GoldenEye and follows the work of Maurice Binder and Robert Brownjohn said: ‘the titles have been a defining element of the Bond films for decades. And a defining feature of the titles has been the girls. Given the spirit of this new film, that simply no longer felt appropriate. In addition, the script sees Bond falling in love, so even on a sub-textual level, having a parade of anonymous beauties wasn’t the way to go.’"