Politics
Politics
- Started
- Last post
- 33,610 Responses
- formed2
This about sums up the thinking and integrity of Moore (and Trump's) supporters:
“All I really know is that Christians will always be attacked no matter what,” said Pamela Hicks, an apartment manager who attended Mr. Moore’s speech on Tuesday. “It could be true, it could be false, but he’s led by God, and that’s all that matters.”
- sums up any religiously motivated person.Gnash
- you do know that Roy Moore denies the allegations that lack any supporting evidence. But your issues with believers in God, in this case is their guiding faith********
- Aside from the pedo issue, his views on homosexuality and Islam are still from 200 years ago. Perfect for Alabama.kingregis
- omg thinks the women accusing moore are liars, but those accusing clinton are telling the truth. that's the thinking of trumptards, in a nutshellmonospaced
- If you think Clinton's track record is squeaky clean, ask Monika Lewinsky and Danney Williams. They tell otherwise.********
- So let's not try and pull bullshit integrity issues. It would be fitting characteristically that Clinton did probably rape those women.********
- The hypocrisy is mind blowing. Yeah, the lack of integrity of the Trumpsters shines brighter and brighter.formed
- let's get you a coloring book so you can color in the semen stains on Lewinsky's dress.********
- being a hornbag adulterer ≠ pedo. you realise this right omg? or are you that stupid?inteliboy
- ^ Don't waste your time arguing with our village idiot.garbage
- hold on, i think you're trying to make some sort of point here. please try and explain to earn the "inteli" portion of your name.********
- What a hypocrite. There's enough supporting evidence to doom him but people like you don't give sh*t. Just keep moving the goal posts to suit you.monkeyshine
- wow how fake you roll with your dooming evidence. you talk a good shit. but doesn't get you anywhere near a goal post. just keep kneeling.********
- Imagine how much of a loser you would have to be to use TOR just to comment on QBN. You must be really afraid of what people think about you.yuekit
- not sure why you believe Roy Moore's denials, but not anyone else ... the double standard is insane, indicative of the ethical rot of the rightmonospaced
- go back and read, retard, I never said Clinton was innocent ... I said that you belive clinton's accusers, but not Roy's, FOR NO GOOD REASONmonospaced
- Let's just begin with you Clinton is not innocent. For me it hangs in limbo of the unknown. Whether his accusers are being truthful or not, he's still guilty.********
- Roy Moore on the other hand doesn't begin with list of scandals and issues such as Lewinsky and Danney Williams.********
- @yuekit - Tor is Firefox that blocks ads, and you can comment on QBN using any browser. How that makes anyone any different is beyond me and your stupidity.********
- Uh huh...it's also much slower and no need to use unless you are hiding or embarrassed.yuekit
- lol what does hiding or embarrassment have to do with ad blocking? who says i have to give my private information to advertisers?********
- But of course that is the argument you would make when someone mentions Clinton because you are hiding and embarrassed of her********
- Actually you should be more embarrassed that outside of the scope of argument, you wanted to talk about my browser usage thinking it matters.********
- you're such an asshole, and given that you're already a fucking moron and devoid of any morality or ethics, you're pretty much a failure of a humanmonospaced
- hahaha I think we both know you don't need TOR to block ads. There are ad blocking plugins for every browser.yuekit
- Why would you rely on a plug-in when your entire browser experience can keep your private information safe and secure from thieving adware?********
- Using TOR to block ads...hmmm trying to think of the appropriate analogy here. It would be like wearing five condoms when you could just have your GF take birthyuekit
- control. Kind of laughably extreme overkill. But I think you know that and are just trolling, so why am I wasting my time here?yuekit
- better question is, why would you support an accused pedophile and sexual criminal after throwing a hissy fit over the clintons?monospaced
- BusterBoy0
^^ So sick of hearing garbage like that. Let's transpose "God" with "Allah" and people would be decrying these people as radical islamists.
- utopian2
Fox News Corrects Story Claiming Roy Moore Accuser ‘Forged’ Candidate’s Signature
https://www.yahoo.com/news/fox-n…
#FakeNews
#MAGA
- PhanLo2
- 'It doesn't like it went beyond clothes on'
'It's possible he could be forgiven'PhanLo - '40 years ago in Alabama, people could get married at 13/14 years old. My grandmother was married at 15, had two kids and a husband.'PhanLo
- One guys says that back in those days hitting on kids was acceptable and some parents would be thrilled that their children were getting hit on by a DA.PhanLo
- How many of these southern conservatives think Al Franken is without sin and should be forgiven?fooler
- @6:50 she just asked if "they" (blacks) believe in aborting a 9 month old baby???fooler
- American Taliban.PhanLo
- What's so great about being conservative?********
- Gotta get this guy a Pobody's Nerfect shirt.ben_
- soros, obama... I'm surprised they didn't bring up hillary's emails.dorf
- 'It doesn't like it went beyond clothes on'
- IRNlun6-6
The U.S. Media Yesterday Suffered its Most Humiliating Debacle in Ages: Now Refuses All Transparency Over What Happened
- But...you support Trump, a far worse liar. So why would you care?yuekit
- Also while Greenwald's critique of that particular story is fair game, let's not forget that Wikileaks did collude with the Trump campaign.yuekit
- As explained here (this has never been debunked or explained and is quite damning for WIkileaks):yuekit
- https://theintercept…yuekit
- It's quite sad as I used to support them but it's clear that Assange simply became a tool for the far right at some point.yuekit
- they made some serious errors which were retracted right away, this happens all the time. but because Trump and his supporters are actually the real snowflakesfadein11
- in this whole fucking embarrassing mess it becomes news lol. Have you spent much time fact-checking the dotard? oh no, thought not. another sad man blaming thefadein11
- media lol.fadein11
- @yuekit, Assange is Putin's tool, the far right is a by product of that.fadein11
- Yeah I'd say it's up for debate what his actual motivations are at this point. Maybe he's just lost his shit after being locked in a room for five years.yuekit
- yep. wikileaks had gone way downhill prior to this russia shit anyway. it had become a vanity projectfadein11
- Humiliating debacles:
MSM: 5 +/- 1
Trump: 1,000 +/- 50,000monospaced - Assange was always clear about his dislike for the Clintons, and when asked why he didn't attack Trump equally, his response was that he had nothing on him.IRNlun6
- Assange has always denied any connection to Russia. A twitter exchange offering oppositional info is not only perfectly legal, collusion is not a crime.IRNlun6
- There's more circumstantial evidence to suggest Hillary worked with Obamas Justice Department and intelligence agencies to spy on and create the Steele dossier.IRNlun6
- aside from that, this type of news is meant to perpetuate the idea of some Trump/Putin collusion that to this day has zero evidence.IRNlun6
- Greenwald made a great point on the tone of how this news was delivered. The gleeful nature, finally the evidence at last! To this day, nothing.IRNlun6
- that's why this isn't some innocent mistake. it's a repeated effort of massive breaking false stories, with very quiet retractions.IRNlun6
- it's an insidious and effective strategy because it doesn't matter how many times it's been false, it still convincing people.IRNlun6
- The thing is that Wikileaks presents itself as a neutral journalistic organization...that... clearly bullshit.yuekit
- Imagine for a moment if the CEO of the NY Times had DM'ed Chelsea Clinton during the campaign. Gave her campaign advice, coordinated publications with her,yuekit
- and then after she won asked to be appointed to an ambassadorship. That's exactly what Assange and Wikileaks did.yuekit
- The story about Wikileaks sharing the link was really just an addendum to that much more damning story.yuekit
- Coordination and collusion implies something much more organized and sinister than a series of twitter messages.IRNlun6
- Taking Trump seriously when he said Farange would be a great ambassador is a bit of a stretch. Even though I wouldn't deny he'd be fine with it.IRNlun6
- WL was publishing a shit ton of information. Many outlets were avoiding it becasue they are clearly against helping Trump in any way.IRNlun6
- That article also is incorrectly states that nothing incriminating was found and deflects to pizza gate story.IRNlun6
- Colluding with Russia would be considered a serious crime actually.monospaced
- There's a lot of information including quid-pro-quo, working directly with media, and exposed the classified nature of Hillary's emails.IRNlun6
- What makes wikileaks such villains today is Hillary Clinton. Had Bernie won the primary, this news would still be big, but wikileaks would be far less hated.IRNlun6
- No mono, surprisingly, there is no crime of collusion. If there where to be a crime it would be for alleged bribes.IRNlun6
- Another bit of information for WL that likely swayed the election for Trump. It let the Bernie fans learn they got fucked by the Clinton Campaign/Dems.IRNlun6
- IRNlun6 you are confusing and misstating things so much I wonder if you didn't read the article I posted above, or if it's intentional.yuekit
- What I was saying is this: during the campaign Wikileaks and Assange insisted they were a neutral organization not favoring either candidate.yuekit
- Meanwhile behind the scenes they were coordinating with the Trump campaign, giving them campaign advice and essentially acting as Trump operatives.yuekit
- Then after Trump won, Assange contacted Trump Jr. and requested Trump appoint him as ambassador to Australia.yuekit
- The Atlantic reported this story originally and it was not debunked, nor did Wikileaks offer any kind of apology or explanation for their actions.yuekit
- https://www.theatlan…yuekit
- Whether in doing all of this they were acting as a proxy for Russia or Russian money is another question. Certainly there are a lot of rich people in Russia whoyuekit
- are very pissed about the Magnitsky sanctions which essentially locks them out of the banking system anywhere outside of Russia.yuekit
- And there are long standing ties between Trump and Russian money (they funded him after he went bankrupt in the 90s when he no one else would lend).yuekit
- Meanwhile Trump's campaign manager worked for a Putin-backed party in Ukraine right before he worked for Trump and was paid 25 million, which he launderedyuekit
- into U.S. real estate. And we know Russia approached Trump Jr. promising dirt on Hillary in exchange for lifting sanctions.yuekit
- Now whether that means Trump himself is literally a puppet of Russia who the fuck knows. It could turn out like Iran Contra where some of the lower level guysyuekit
- take the fall and are then pardoned. But to say media made up the whole thing is ridiculous, makes me think you are only watching Trump-approved news.yuekit
- "It’s not clear what investigators will make of the correspondence." This is the correspondence that they just used to accuse Trump Jr.IRNlun6
- "American intelligence services have accused" Again, accusation and not confirmed fact.IRNlun6
- These articles debunk themselves. They makes spurious accusations. "The Secret Correspondence" Twitter, a public message board with a direct messaging feature.IRNlun6
- "American intel. services have accused the Kremlin ... deliberate effort to boost President Donald Trump’s chances while bringing down his Democratic rival"IRNlun6
- This is a sneaky sentence. Sandwiched between their interpretation of the "correspondence", and Trump Jr. turning over the messages.IRNlun6
- Like I said above...the point of that specific article is not "Russian collusion" which is a much bigger topic.yuekit
- It's that Wikileaks themselves were conspiring with the Trump campaign and even asked for payback afterwards. All while presenting themselves as neutralyuekit
- and insisting they didn't support either side in public. That alone pretty much shreds Assange's remaining credibility for me. The question of what theiryuekit
- motives were in doing this is a separate one.yuekit
- That sentence ties the allegation made by "Intelligence services" of wikileaks being Russian directed, with Trump investigation. Evidence, yet to be found.IRNlun6
- I know people have a low opinion of Trumps intelligence but do you seriously think they considered Assange to be Ambassador to Australia?IRNlun6
- No offense but you seem to struggle with reading comprehension IRNlun6. Reread my comments above...yuekit
- Trump won, and believe it or not he can completely pardon Assange, and appoint him as an Ambassador. Total legal too! He'll likely put him in prison instead.IRNlun6
- This isn't exactly the best format for conversation while both are typing.IRNlun6
- Was Assange biased towards Trump while claiming otherwise. I would agree with you, yes he was.IRNlun6
- I wouldn't say media just makes it up. I read a very strong bias. Part believing genuinely in the accusations, and part politically driven narrative.IRNlun6
- Rephrasing: Was Assange bias when claiming to be neutral? I agree that it looks like he supported Trump.IRNlun6
- hehe********
- ********-7
- Derp Statekingregis
- Moore is a pedo tho...inteliboy
- lol, ancient scripture vs legislationmonospaced
- disregard for separation of church and state is only for fucktards like omg, and all the other assholes who support himmonospaced
- You really are a fuck knuckle trollomgtard3K.BusterBoy
- Fucktard omg just made 5 more Rubles ... Chaaaa ChingRamanisky2
- To all in this thread: Just ignore him. He gets off on being an ass.garbage
- Anybody who thinks Moore is some family values bad-ass gunslinger is a mental midget, and their views can stay at the kids table.garbage
- But go ahead omg. You don't have shit to argue with, just shitty cartoons drawn by a pussy with a cowboy hat in Montana. I'm listening.garbage
- Just think, people will pick over things in History class. What will they call this political era?monoboy
- ********7
Seriously, a Pedo?
So we have people in QBN supporting a Pedo?This is a new low for QBN...
Fucking WOW!We had people banned for less.
Fuck you Moderators!
- ********4
Support Pedro NOT a Pedo!...
- ********4
QBN...so SAD!
- ********7
Pedo Dems = BAD
Pedo Reps = GOOD- the logic behind the morally void, ethically-fucked trump base, and false christians of the far right assholesmonospaced
- ********11
OMG + ROBO + IRN = QBN PEDO RING!
- fuck you oey you whiny little bitchIRNlun6
- go save some puppies and beg for money you fucking loserIRNlun6
- lolmoldero
- lol, IRN so triggered, like the whiny little snowflake bitches that make up the entirety of trumptardsmonospaced
- i lol'dRamanisky2
- pmsl...a truly great 24 hours for seeing the trumptards on this site melt from snowflake to puddle of pissfadein11
- from snowflakes to pedophile defendersmonospaced
- for asking what the most compelling evidence against Moore is? real hard hitting question there...IRNlun6
- lol, so triggeredmonospaced
- Oey is now a sexual harasser to members on QBN, while other members just circle around and laugh.********
- no he isn'tmonospaced
- I'm a sexual harasser? LMFAO!********
- I asked one god damn questionIRNlun6
- damn pedosGuyFawkes
- your question implied that the dozens of women speaking out on Moore are lying, while you believe all the ones who speak out on anyone elsemonospaced
- so, basically, it sounds like you're questioning why anyone would be upset with a pedophile in office, and a moronic president supporting himmonospaced
- the solution is simple: condemn moore for being an accused pedophile and sexual fuckwad, and set the record straight that you don't support pedophilia.monospaced
- Mono you piece of shit. I will not be put in the position to accuse anyone of pedophilia based purely trusting an accuser.IRNlun6
- That question should have been simple to answer. The responses are more than telling.IRNlun6
- I don't hide my location. You or anyone want to come at me in real life just say so. I will smash your fucking teeth through the back of your fucking skull.IRNlun6
- lolGuyFawkes
- calm down bud, we’re all friends here.GuyFawkes
- lol at the whataboutism. mono still is a piece of shit though********
- Whip out my map to check where everyone’s at. https://i.imgur.com/…pango
- lol, look at this tough guymonospaced
- Seriously... you guys hit a new low... I'd knock the fuck out of you IRL if any of you attempted to associate me w/pedofilia in way shape or formPonyBoy
- more power to you, IRN
http://www.qbn.com/r…PonyBoy - I'm not associating anyone with Pedophilia...you can not read between the lines or can not understand a joke on them backing up that candidate.********
- besides, it's fake news! LOL!********
- mono I have seen first hand what a mob can do to people. I do not take kindly to being pressured to condemn anyone. I apologize for lashing out.IRNlun6
- Let's say you just walked into a QBN meetup, IRN... oey says "Hey Everyone! 1/3 the QBN Pedo Club is here!!" How would you react?PonyBoy
- Something tells me oey isn't stupid enough to say such a thing in public but then again here he is defending it like it's still funny... I'd knock your...PonyBoy
- ... fucking teeth out if someone did that to me in public... but again— I really don't that much of an idiot... are you, oey?PonyBoy
- I really don't... *think that anyone here... is that much an idiotPonyBoy
- no?********
- would you say that in public, oey?PonyBoy
- pedo defenders and defenders of pedo defenders are people too!GuyFawkes
- Thanks PonyBoy. We both got carried away and have apologized to each other.IRNlun6
- this sexual harassment has gotten out of hand and has to stop. oey still a denialist.********
- ********5
Ban these sick stunts!
- ********3
2017 the year Pedofilia got legit...again!
- for shits and giggles. how is a gays sexual preference different than a pedo or a foot jockey?********
- we can say by the standard of law, but than we define gay marriage as such illegal. we can say by age but we choose military before alcohol.********
- it might seem sick and twisted to you. but remember that is how church goers feel about gays. take this viewpoint to see the other side when you act so emotiona********
- i know my nature when i was 14 pining after women regardless of age. all i wanted is a little carnal knowledge and get my dick wet.********
- and brings up nature vs rule of law. and which is incorrect based on perspective. u get closed minded and fall into the ban hammer of difference********
- you lose any high ground. your no better than person hating gays or those different********
- Aah. The old gay / paedophilia trope. Get fucked you pinheaded little cunt.face_melter
- i couldn't say it better face_melter.********
- But this is a guy who poses as an ultra moralist..and wants to erase the line between government and religion.yuekit
- Even if a 30 something dating 15 year olds doesn't bother you, it's hypocrisy on a ridiculously absurd level.yuekit
- Kevin "deathboy" Spaceyfadein11
- lol, you're comparing a sexual preference to wanting to fuck children!?!?!? what a fucking sick thing to say!monospaced
- that, in a nutshell, is the backwards, morally-fucked ethically challenged, HATEFUL, bigoted thinking of "christians" right theremonospaced
- even implying homosexuality is a choice is so fucking ignorant, it makes anyone who claims that sound like a medieval fucktardmonospaced
- lol ... fucking hell ... hating a pedophile is not comparable to hating a person based on their NATURAL sexual orientationmonospaced
- deathboy has gone full ruhtard.
Not surprising.Ramanisky2 - Fucking an underage child is illegal. Being gay isn't. Next thing you'll try to argue that being gay should be illegal too. Please don't be that asshole.monospaced
- he already is that asshole.fadein11
- I dunno. I think he's just partly making a comparison, for a discussion.monospaced
- it's a v.old comparison/discussio... which only assholes ever make.fadein11
- haha you guys are no different than the ultra gay haters. a sexual preference is a sexual preference. you set the rules in which defines the morality.********
- its hypocrisy to choose one natural preference over any other natural preference. plus a very interesting thing is also how did the idea of a child come about?********
- postman books on the disappearance of childhood and how the idea of children is going back to once it was because an abundance of information********
- interesting book and observations but im guessing no one is interested in that.********
- if I need to reiterate my stance, it's i dont care what goes on behind doors if its consensual. i also think gays fucked up on marriage wanting to be recognize********
- equally when they should have attacked special privileges or gov rules that straight married people get. they should have wanted those stripped. after all********
- marriage is only a social contract. and no im not religious but I can still like some teachings in all religion or just have faith in a cosmic karma or shit********
- asswipe confirmed.fadein11
- and in the spirit of the season with all the sexual harrassment stuff. sex is awkward. mixed signals, or uncertainty, fear of nakedness and judgement. it can********
- be quite messy. honest mixed signals isn't harassment, and using position of influence to cater to relations is not poor form. its actually quite natural darwin********
- louie ck for example i see did nothing wrong. except cheat on his wife, but maybe they had a deal you can jerk off for any other chic but dont fuck them********
- i dont even think moore has done anything wrong from what i read. went on some dates, all consensual. but his politics i dont like. he's a hypocrite on rule of********
- law vs his gods law. but hey theres my soap box for the mornin********
- so, what you're saying is, a group of religious extremists thinks gays should be lumped in with kid fuckers, and should represent us in government?monospaced
- fuck that shit, that's some hate filled, ignorant ass backwoods thinking if I've ever heard itmonospaced
- and no, I'm not even comparable to a homophobe because I refuse to lump homosexuality in with pedophiliamonospaced
- im saying sexual preference = sexual preference. pretty basic mono. A = A. I'm not saying you can't be discriminate in what you feel is acceptable. Theres********
- no hate, no emotion, involved whatsoever in stating the obvious truth here. But you can learn from it. You obviously share the same feelings that religious beli********
- evers feel about gays. so what you feel right now is akin to how they feel. Maybe shows a little more tolerance when explaining the reasoning. And acceptance********
- in discrimination when dealing with human beings like in the case of a baker. a couple of you guys seem to be missing the bigger picture.********
- yeah, I get it ... christians hate gay people and are like "well, if being gay isn't illegal, then I support someone who tries to fuck underage girls."monospaced
- that is the gist of what you're sayingmonospaced
- that is what they're doing ... they're out there, just like you're doing here, saying that it's natural to want to fuck underage girls, and they support mooremonospaced
- come on mono you aren't that dense. Im saying christians dont like gay sexual preferences, you don't like nubile preferences. you both share strong emo dicrima********
- tory views. And i use nubile because i don't think its age that causes sexual arrousal, or it might be. So you share same views in wanting rules to protect you********
- r world views. i thought this is a perfect instance to illuminate that and perhaps you should think about it.********
- Im wondering why you dont think being attracted to young nubile people is not natural? You think we can send pedos to straight camps to fix their choices?********
- I'm ALSO saying that christians don't like gays, and are using that argument to justify supporting pedophilia.monospaced
- Just like you are, except they mean it. Now, I'm PROUD to be dense if I think it's unnatural to fuck a 14 year old. Go ahead and say it's normal in public.monospaced
- At least I'm not the one defending and supporting Roy Moore, who has been accused of this by many people over decades. That's some deplorable, backwards shit.monospaced
- @deathboy, you send pedos to jail for fucking children. You don't do that with gay people. Straight camps don't work for gays, because being gay isn't a choice.monospaced
- if a pedo doesn't act on his/her desires, aka, doesn't rape a minor, then they are not criminals ... how is that hard to grasp?monospaced
- Your law that sends pedos to jail is no different than the law that kills gays in iran. In iran if a gay doesn't have homo sex he doesn't die. Would u accept a********
- law in the states to jail gays? Even if its democratically voted for? Which agian sexual preference = sexual preference. You choose to make one wrong and anoth********
- er ok based on how you feel about it. same as religion people who see god law as killing gays as unnatural by nature of procreation********
- WTF?!?!??!********
- I guess I cant use reason to convince a backwater church indoctrinated person abot their views on gays no differently than a educated indoctrinated city slicker********
- perhaps you can simple state why a sexual preference is not a sexual preference. so far u have only stated a human law. which law changes. either you support********
- contradicting laws as they are, or the law of identity.********
- i think thats your hangup. u somehow think they are different, same as a difference in hetero or homo. I just don't see how you think they are different.********
- lol, you're off the deep end ... at least I can share my thoughts in public without being considered a sick fuckmonospaced
- and at the same time, you're 100% right, I'm AGREEING that christians hate gays, and that our laws don't agree with that, and isn't like the Iranians.monospaced
- Personally, I think the current laws get it mostly right: gays are human beings, equal in every way, and pedophiles are troubled and child rape is bad.monospaced
- AND YES, that's just a human law. Being gay ISN'T a choice though. Fucking a kid is. If you have issue with that like Moore supporters, then that's on you.monospaced
- So we're free to choose our genders, but according to mono, being gay isn't a choice.********
- Did Kevin Spacey not claim that he will now choose to live a gay life?********
- If you have sex with a transexual, does that make you transexual, gay or straight?********
- ha justification of majority in saying im a sick fuck. freeing niggers was sick talk to. same as being gay. dont base it on human law and culture.base arguemen********
- ts on reason. you ever read platos symposium? but maybe you are confused about sexual preference because it associates choice. and that word is used in gay camp********
- but we all choose based on our proclivities. meaning if you are attracted to same sex choose so. christians say that is a bad choice, you say nubile is bad********
- that is hypocrisy. at least admit it and live by it. really where id have liked to see you have taken this is the angle of consent. where people who see the pri********
- nciple and hypocrisy would take it. socrates would say if you find it a problem than keep your boy away from me. the role of the parent in deciding over the********
- youth. Can a person contest but somehow not know what they are doing? which many 14 years old know more about sex than 45 years old these days with internet********
- the biological implifications of the age of puberty and the how hormones in food products have been making puberty happen faster********
- you really could act a bit more open minded and get out of your monospaced belief structures.********
- lol, trust me, this isn't a unique belief structure here ... I'm AGREEING with your point that man-made views are differing.monospaced
- so I get it, you're talking about the nature of our species ... fine. I agree, sexual attraction is instinct.monospaced
- WHat I'M saying, is that only christians and foreign extremists seem to think being gay is an abomination. You ALSO said that.monospaced
- What I'M saying is that we're seeing this ugly head rear up on the right, to defend child molestation, arguing that it's OKAY because it's NATURAL!monospaced
- What I'M saying isn't a lack of open mindedness. I'm saying that if someone argues in favor of pedophilia, like is ACTUALLY happening, they're assholesmonospaced
- It is NOT hypocritical of me to say homosexuality is not a crime, and that pedophilia is. That's actual law. There's no flaw in my "belief structure."monospaced
- I can't help but think that you're making this fucked logical leap to somehow JUSTIFY Trump's support of an accused criminal pedophile and sexual deviant.monospaced
- so the army of tards is growing in QBN...WTF?!********
- Meanwhile mono never gave a shit when Muslims were stoning gays and throwing them off roofs. But Christians....********
- Those Christians and their crazy Christmas.... am i right? Islamaphobia, yea?********
- @deathboy Kids are stupid. Puberty isn't a start whistle.garbage
- @omg Nice strawman, yawn. If you're actually going to try to go to the mattresses and scream Clinton and Franklin, Muslims etc..garbage
- ..yet completely write off Moore, Trump, Shortey, Christian terrorists. It seems you either don't care or can't understand, so shut the fuck up you daft twat.garbage
- Well mono i've given up since you still seem to justify the point by the law. It's absolutely hypocrisy to say one instinct is correct and not the other.********
- @garbage your arguement is better than all of the others because it is the one that actual law is based upon. is age = to ability to consent********
- with alcohol we say no drinking before 21 because kids are stupid. and yet we draw a line (state dependent) at age of consent, but allow kids to get drunk on se********
- x under the age of consent. as long as they dont have sex across that imaginary line. If it happens and consentual only one party is guilty, but with other********
- stuff we dont allow minors for stupidity both parties get in trouble (shoulder tapping). If its dumb to make mistakes as kids, but adults do it as well are they********
- not dumb? We have some really weird rules on these topics because of the nature to openly discuss them because of judgemental ppl. maybe a gay would understand********
- personally i think its a minor offense, up there with doing weed or coke or drunken in public by LAW. But it shouldn't need laws like weed was banned.********
- personally i take the socratic approach and put it on the parents if there kids are out there doing shit. As a parent I'd be upset if my 14 year was dating a 30********
- i wonder if the parents of the child was happy she was with moore a lawyer man. its not uncommon for many parents to sell children out for upgraded lifestyle********
- anyways id not vote for moore based on his politics. i dont think hes worth reading about to much but what i got was everything was consentual and when the chi********
- c declined he did the gentleman thing and drove her home and didnt harass her. but really the logic is more fun********
- for shits and giggles. how is a gays sexual preference different than a pedo or a foot jockey?
- ********0
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ro…
Russia and Vladimir Putin
Moore has strongly praised Russian President Vladimir Putin, stating that he is maybe "more akin to me than I know [myself]". When asked whether he believed whether Russia interfered in the 2016 United States elections, Moore stated, "Everybody else thinks it's the Russians. I think it was the providential hand of God."[188][189]
- plash0
Roy Moore in 2011: Getting rid of amendments after 10th would 'eliminate many problems'
https://edition.cnn.com/2017/12/…
13th amendment: ended slavery; 15th amendment: prevents voter discrimination; 19th amendment: gives women the right to vote.. you know the 'problems'
