Logo Crit
- Started
- Last post
- 46 Responses
- fyoucher10
To be honest, I don't like any of them or any of the directions.
- brandelec0
1. couldn't tell that was B until i saw the rest
2. reads Ub and not feeling the stretched interior design underneath.. design looks lost out there
3. read "US" and
4. not sure why there's a period but the graphic is looking heavy metal
5. meh
- brandelec0
i'm with fyoucher, not getting interior design from any of these
- bulletfactory0
Most of these aren't reading as VB or conveying interior design.
1. Not reading the B
2. reads UB
3. reads US
4. i dunno, but not reading as interior design - seems like I've seen something similar before
5. feels more architecture or construction
- desmo0
They are all a little bit too abstract. You dont get a sense of interior design at first glance. If the monogram was on its own, it wouldnt readable at all. Simplify it. Seems like you are trying to 'over design' it
- Miesfan0
Try to tell less things with the logo.
Perhaps with these designs, too much influence on the expectations of prospective customers.
What kind of things she do?
- mrghost0
maybe a bit of reading will inspire you to jump over all those usual turtles.
- akrok0
too much going on.
no. 5 looks like a down arrow which is really bad. (it's going down)
- i_monk0
4 is the most interesting, but I'm seeing "Sb" rather than "vb". It does look a little Goth Emo Metal Wristcutter too.
- NONEIS0
They all look some what yonic – and with a name like Virgina, that's probably not the best thing...
- Miguex0
I'm going to agree with i_monk here, 4 is the most interesting to me as well, I think it's not quite there yet, but I like the isotype the best from all the options (for this specific client). I agree it needs to be simple and elegant. I would choose a classic/ refined typeface to go below. Maybe all in capital letters? (like on option 3)I wouldwork on refining the isotype a bit too, loose the dot, and clean it up a bit.
Is going in the right direction,
- CanHazQBN0
Come on, people. #1 is the best by far. It even looks like some sort of modular furniture or something.
- Maybe, but #1 alone has three or four different gimmicks going ondetritus
- < not feeling the type relationship to the mark thoughBaths
- the type needs to line up on the sides, instead of hanging out.CanHazQBN
- so you disregard a decent mark because of some needed minor tweaks to the type??CanHazQBN
- to me it looks like a sports mark, but I like it.Miguex
- dbloc0
I'd say #1 because it looks like it could be a piece of furniture, but using it as the B is a little Obscure. Maybe if you abbed the B above it and used that just as an icon.
- bjladams0
i think #1 without the strange "B" and keep the "interior design" all one size and weight.
- capn_ron0
- lolhorton
- el oh elCanHazQBN
- Ha Haadbloc
- Ha! Well played sirdesmo
- i don't get it?yeeblazer
- ...you have to B. there.CanHazQBN
- this was my first lol of the morning.jurassica
- *golf clap*VectorMasked
- very well played indeed
ThisIsMe - hahah!!
GTFO MY LOGO RON!!!
hehe, sadly my logo looks better as a V :(Hombre_Lobo_2