Iran war/WW3
- Started
- Last post
- 423 Responses
- GeorgesII0
the usual coallition of the willing
"several former Soviet Republics, major African states, Israel, Saudi Arabia and the Persian Gulf states came to a combined decision to act against Syria."
- qoob0
^ Fucken Africans!
- Dillinger0
The same NATO that allowed 200k people to die in the Balkans because there was no oil.
- GeorgesII0
The same NATO that decreted a no fly zone over libya and bombed them for peace as soon as the first place touched down
- pablo280
Syrian Rebels burned Netherland Flag and thought it's the Russian one
- qoob0
U.S. scales back joint military exercise with Israel
http://www.haaretz.com/news/dipl…
Time Magazine reports number of American troops in mid-October exercise to be cut by two-thirds, in what a senior Israeli official says is a message of mistrust conveyed by Washington.
- boobs0
Lots of assholes have nuclear weapons. China, North Korea, Russia, Pakistan, etc.. And the former USSR had thousands of them.
Why get so worried about piddly-fuck Iran?
- because they are crazy enough to use onespmitch
- don't forget usaplash
- funny how everyone always ignore israel...GeorgesII
- @spmitch, can you name me the only country that ever used a nuclear device on a civilian population, I'll be waitingGeorgesII
- the only country to ever use nuclear weapons -- can you guess it?drgs
- @ GeorgesII- and look where that has lead us to. there is some science we should not unleash on the worldspmitch
- GeorgesII0
http://www.informationclearingho…
August 28, 2012 "Information Clearing House" ---- The Non-Aligned Movement (NAM), formed in 1961 during the Cold War, is a group of 120 states and 17 observer states not formally aligned with or against any major power bloc. The NAM held its opening 2012 session yesterday under the new chairmanship of Iran, which succeeded Egypt as the Chair.Significantly, an Associated Press story in the Washington Post headlined, “Iran opens nonaligned summit with calls for nuclear arms ban”, reported that “Iranian Foreign Minister Ali Akbar Salehi opened the gathering by noting commitment to a previous goal from the nonaligned group, known as NAM, to remove the world’s nuclear arsenals within 13 years. ‘We believe that the timetable for ultimate removal of nuclear weapons by 2025, which was proposed by NAM, will only be realized if we follow it up decisively,’ he told delegates.”
Yet the New York Times, which has been beating the drums for war with Iran, just as it played a disgraceful role in the deceptive reporting during the lead-up to the Iraq War, never mentioned Iran’s proposal for nuclear abolition. The Times carried the bland headline on its front page, “At Summit Meeting, Iran Has a Message for the World”, and then went on to state, “the message is clear. As Iran plays host to the biggest international conference ...it wants to tell its side of the long standoff with the Western powers which are increasingly convinced that Tehran is pursuing nuclear weapons”, without ever reporting Iran’s offer to support the NAM proposal for the abolition of nuclear weapons by 2025...
- ukit20
"The idea that Israel will attack Iran is nonsense, because it’s suicide.
By attacking Iran—even in the midst of a US election campaign—Israel would risk angering and alienating Washington, its main patron, in a manner likely to forever change the US-Israeli relationship for the worse. Second, with nearly the entire Israeli national security establishment strongly opposed to striking Iran, Netanyahu and Barak would isolate themselves politically, collapse their own government, and perhaps propel a much more dovish coalition into power. Third, striking Iran would trigger devastating counterattacks from Tehran and its allies, including the well-armed Hezbollah movement in Lebanon, leading to hundreds, if not thousands, of Israel civilian casualties. Fourth, already isolated internationally, Israel would turn itself into a global pariah, a kind of rogue state blamed for the consequent skyrocketing of oil prices, economic carnage and a reverberating military conflict in and around the Persian Gulf that could roil the region for a decade or more."
- never underestimate the power the jew lobby has in the US. jew tentacles extend everywhere...ebertzjaw
- they killed the lord jesus too!ebertzjaw
- IF he wasnt killed then you wont be saved remember. so they did you a favor son. just kiddinyurimon
- jesus is actually satan, just a big trickaaux
- Yes Jesus/Satan...the ol' switcherooukit2
- pablo280
Top US officer visits Israel amid rift over whether to attack Iran
http://worldnews.nbcnews.com/_ne…
- ETM0
Canada closes embassy in Iran, expels Iranian diplomats
http://www.cbc.ca/news/politics/…
- hotroddy0
What's the big deal? Let them develop their own nuclear weapons. They can't use it anyway in fear of retaliation.
</diplomacy>
- pablo280
- Some fucked up shit!
Amerika Fuck Yeah!utopian - lol at that bullshit.futuremongolian
- left right, same shit, if you dont see it, well that sucks.
i didnt watch this vid btwmoldero
- Some fucked up shit!
- pablo280
An armada of US and British naval power is massing in the Persian Gulf in the belief that Israel is considering a pre-emptive strike against Iran’s covert nuclear weapons programme.
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/…
- pablo280
Netanyahu: Iran on brink of nuclear bomb in 6-7 months
http://uk.reuters.com/article/20…
Anything to justify another war
- reanimate0
Meir Dagan, Former Mossad Chief, Says Attack On Iran 'Stupidest Idea' He's Ever Heard
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/20…- that's what he want's the iranians to think and then...pow!_niko
- pablo280
Iran launched a submarine and a destroyer into the Gulf from Bandar Abbas port on Tuesday at the same time as U.S. and allied navies held exercises in the same waters to practice keeping oil shipping lanes open.
http://www.reuters.com/article/2…- You really want that fuckn war,
do you have some kind of sick fetichism of death? serious QGeorgesII - http://www.feniksgra…pablo28
- You really want that fuckn war,
