Shooting of the Day
- Started
- Last post
- 2,785 Responses
- GeorgesII0
- Heh, that's ridiculousfyoucher1
- So it's unliely to get a assault rifle, but assault weapons are unbannable because they aren't defined...locustsloth
- ... says the graphic that just defined themlocustsloth
- Sure is. Stupid, really.formed
- chossy0
Why on earth did you post that image Georges?
- so that you stop labeling all firearms assault weapons, do you really think banning "assault rifle" will stop criminals from using them?GeorgesII
- using them?GeorgesII
- bad excuse, Georges, it might not stop them all, but it's a move in the right directionmonospaced
- right direction for what?. damn you are naive...yurimon
- do you know the economics of prohibition? not only that if history is guide we are f'd.yurimon
- My fucking God, why is it only in the US people use such ridiculous logic?formed
- Because they're a 'Christian Nation'.
Pfffrrrrtft.mikotondria3
- chossy0
I said all firearms are assault weapons?
In which thread?
- dopepope0
- Wtf with YouTube links now? Everyone I see is all screwy and doesn't embed for me. Ever.dopepope
- He's a tool. the British Geraldo Rivera. His career not going to last.
yurimon - QBN needs to hire a developer to fix this issuemoldero
- because i dont think who made this, owns thismoldero
- I think it's because I try to link on an iPad. Shit is weird on an iPad.dopepope
- dumb shit... that's youtu.be, not youtube...monospaced
- you have to get the fucking website right before you bitch like a bitch ;)monospaced
- I then went to Youtube.com and the link started with an m.
m.youtube.com wtf?dopepope - youtube changed their share thingymoldero
- dopepope0
- Cause I am Pier Morgan MY fanny is better then yoOrs...yurimon
- thanmonospaced
- Yet another Fanatical Right Wing Republitard Gun Nut!utopian
- who you utopian? or they guy tryin to help piers morgan clarify piers' hypocritical point of view?yurimon
- what is you yanks obsession with the left vs right?inteliboy
- yurimon0
- His Fanny is prettier then youyurimon
- thanmonospaced
- haha thanks.yurimon
- orrinward20
Bus on fire.
4 police injured. One needed to go to hospital.
5 plastic bullets fired.
http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-nor…Northern Ireland is a mess. I bet the Northern Irish really wish they had the freedom to own guns with crazy shit like this going down.
- molotov cocktail of the day™melq
- Yeah, because tit for tat violence has always been the answer to Northern Ireland's problems.********
- either this is a joke or you haven't a cluelowimpakt
- My comments were of the sarcastic variety.orrinward2
- monkeyshine0
If we can't ban "so-called assault weapons" can we ban assault weapons?
- Depends. If you think putting a pistol grip on my son's hunting rifle suddenly makes it more deadly, then sure.melq
- formed0
So, according to that "assault rifle definition" above, and AR-15 is NOT an assault weapon because it does not have a selective full auto mode? WTF. Never mind that it is the civilian/legal version of the M-16. Is an M-16 with the full auto taken out (as many are) no longer an assault rifle?? Jesus.
Or how about a H&K MP5...not an assault rifle because it fires "pistol rounds"?? WTF. Never mind that it is a favorite weapon of many elite squads.
I guess an M-10 and M-11 aren't either, even though they are/were a favorite for drive by assassinations. And an Uzi, too, is NOT an assault weapon.NOT an assault weapon:
NOT an assault weapon:
(I don't think that was the point of the diagram, but still, shows how there needs to be clarity and education out there)
My definition: Assault Weapon - capable of holding 3 or more rounds
- formed0
If you don't classify by capacity then what are you going to use? An M-16 fires a common hunting round.
We gonna go by looks? You can get a large clip for so many common guns, making them no different than a M-16 (with full auto disabled).
Personally, I think there should simply be very demanding licensing for all weapons. More bullets, more classes, training, etc. Anyone that buys an Bushman should have to learn how to handle that weapon and appreciate it.
If you want to hunt, you don't need more than a few rounds. If you want to protect your family, get a shotgun.
Personally, I can't see how anyone can argue against that.
(the H&K is a gun I have loved since probably 10, I have stacks of their catalogs, I have stacks of info on the MAC-10, almost bought a MAC-11 ages ago, but I could never argue the logic that I would have to take a significant amount of classes and training to purchase it)
- http://www.qbn.com/t…yurimon
- Anthonie Codringtongabriel2
- who's that? nothing comes up in search...yurimon
- 251 West 15th streetgabriel2
- ********0
Everyone should have more weapons in their homes just in case the government suddenly becomes tyrannous... It's better to live in a violent, paranoid society than be sorry.
- chossy0
In 2008 more people were shot and killed in Chicago alone than us soldiers who died in Iraq. The Iraqis were using bombs and anything they could get their hands on yet they still didn't manage to kill close to the amount of people america managed to kill of their own, with guns in one state.
- monkeyshine0
this whole needing to protect ourselves against a tyrannical govt. is so ridiculous. If the govt. wanted to f*ck with someone like that Yeager (the crazy gun nut who posted the video on packing a bag and getting ready...) it would be so easy. They could label him a terrorist and he'd be hauled off (I suspect if he were a ranting muslim rather than a ranting redneck he'd be gone by now).
These people have seen Rambo one too many times.
- I think its easier in a 90% approval rate. not 45-55% approval. individualism has its attributes after all.yurimon
- formed0
Exactly. It is so absurd it literally gives me a headache when I read "gotta protect..."..."cars kill..."....blah blah blah.
Then again, 50% of the country thinks giving wealthy tax breaks is a good idea too.
I'll never underestimate the power of mob marketing and fear mongering. It is the most successful marketing campaign ever, that, and the "trickle down theory". Genius marketing, really.
The irony is that everyone was so scared about terrorists that they sat by and watched the gov't take insane power from the people, all the while cheering on.
If the gov't wants to take power, that is how they will do it. They don't need armies, some idiot with a closet full of guns will be hauled off in a millisecond. There will be no "organization" and "militia".
Personally, I can't think anyone with a high school degree really believes that crap, they just spout it out so they can keep their "toys".
- formed0
Gun Shows
Did everyone know that you don't have to do background checks (in most states) for purchasing guns at gun shows?
Insane.