Artificial Intelligence
- Started
- Last post
- 1,323 Responses
- Krassy3
- jeez, where that plumbers course link?_niko
- honestly you really have nothing to worry about i sort of feel bad for AI folks who think the graphics industry is some sort land of of milk and honeyjonny_quest_lives
- https://www.shutters…jonny_quest_lives
- https://www.vecteezy…jonny_quest_lives
- they've created a tool that caters to a crowd that doesn't want to pay creative in general so good luck monetizing the tooljonny_quest_lives
- same with 3D https://www.turbosqu…jonny_quest_lives
- cheap assets have never been a problemjonny_quest_lives
- "Design logos in Seconds Instead Of Hours/Days. write your logo prompt and watch your logos generate from scratch in front of your eyes within seconds."jagara
- Oh fuck off.jagara
- lol :Dsted
- Bye Bye Adobe!utopian
- Hasta la vista, baby!utopian
- https://www.youtube.…utopian
- "Vectorize logos & get
your designs up to
industry standard. (coming soon)"jonny_quest_lives - coming soon... mhmmmjonny_quest_lives
- "industry standard" mhmmmjonny_quest_lives
- https://media.tenor.…jonny_quest_lives
- which industry standard?jonny_quest_lives
- Isn't it just learning what other logos look like and will more than likely replicate some crap it finds on a "vector graphics" site? Looks like it to me.canoe
- canoe0
“...without hesitating, the software replied with a cogent, well-organized bio populated entirely with imaginary facts...” aka lies
- #fictionimbecile
- TRUFutopian
- When asked to write a bio for a person that doesn't exist it created a fictionalized bio.
Who would have thunk!palimpsest - Play stupid games, win stupid prizes.palimpsest
- You're missing the point.canoe
- It's not that it can make shit up, it's the fact that it does make shit up. It will believe anything it says. You don't seem to understand the bigger issue...canoe
- because you're biased afcanoe
- I don't think it's sentient, therefore in can't believe what it says. I performs a task assigned by a human to the best of its abilities.palimpsest
- How is my opinion [more] biased than anyone's else. Do you think I am an AI?palimpsest
- sted0
Keep your AI claims in check
By
Michael Atleson, Attorney, FTC Division of Advertising Practices
February 27, 2023A creature is formed of clay. A puppet becomes a boy. A monster rises in a lab. A computer takes over a spaceship. And all manner of robots serve or control us. For generations we’ve told ourselves stories, using themes of magic and science, about inanimate things that we bring to life or imbue with power beyond human capacity. Is it any wonder that we can be primed to accept what marketers say about new tools and devices that supposedly reflect the abilities and benefits of artificial intelligence (AI)?
And what exactly is “artificial intelligence” anyway? It’s an ambiguous term with many possible definitions. It often refers to a variety of technological tools and techniques that use computation to perform tasks such as predictions, decisions, or recommendations. But one thing is for sure: it’s a marketing term. Right now it’s a hot one. And at the FTC, one thing we know about hot marketing terms is that some advertisers won’t be able to stop themselves from overusing and abusing them.
AI hype is playing out today across many products, from toys to cars to chatbots and a lot of things in between. Breathless media accounts don’t help, but it starts with the companies that do the developing and selling. We’ve already warned businesses to avoid using automated tools that have biased or discriminatory impacts. But the fact is that some products with AI claims might not even work as advertised in the first place. In some cases, this lack of efficacy may exist regardless of what other harm the products might cause. Marketers should know that — for FTC enforcement purposes — false or unsubstantiated claims about a product’s efficacy are our bread and butter.
When you talk about AI in your advertising, the FTC may be wondering, among other things:
Are you exaggerating what your AI product can do? Or even claiming it can do something beyond the current capability of any AI or automated technology? For example, we’re not yet living in the realm of science fiction, where computers can generally make trustworthy predictions of human behavior. Your performance claims would be deceptive if they lack scientific support or if they apply only to certain types of users or under certain conditions.
Are you promising that your AI product does something better than a non-AI product? It’s not uncommon for advertisers to say that some new-fangled technology makes their product better – perhaps to justify a higher price or influence labor decisions. You need adequate proof for that kind of comparative claim, too, and if such proof is impossible to get, then don’t make the claim.
Are you aware of the risks? You need to know about the reasonably foreseeable risks and impact of your AI product before putting it on the market. If something goes wrong – maybe it fails or yields biased results – you can’t just blame a third-party developer of the technology. And you can’t say you’re not responsible because that technology is a “black box” you can’t understand or didn’t know how to test.
Does the product actually use AI at all? If you think you can get away with baseless claims that your product is AI-enabled, think again. In an investigation, FTC technologists and others can look under the hood and analyze other materials to see if what’s inside matches up with your claims. Before labeling your product as AI-powered, note also that merely using an AI tool in the development process is not the same as a product having AI in it.
This message is not new. Advertisers should take another look at our earlier AI guidance, which focused on fairness and equity but also said, clearly, not to overpromise what your algorithm or AI-based tool can deliver. Whatever it can or can’t do, AI is important, and so are the claims you make about it. You don’t need a machine to predict what the FTC might do when those claims are unsupported.
- sted2
coming soon:
AI = leftist soros money- My conspiracy mate said AI was a distraction tool created by the Chinese. Same with TikTok.PhanLo
- Just got a new one GPU manufacturers pushing the narrative :D
https://www.antipope…sted - it doesn't matter that it took several years of development to get here and the results were available to everyone :)sted
- sted0
Facebook/Meta entered the game
- https://media.tenor.…bezoar
- Prompt: Never Skip Legs Day.utopian
- palimpsest4
It's getting cheeky!
Title: "Echoes of the Past"
Concept: The artwork consists of a large, dimly-lit room with a single pedestal in the center. On the pedestal is an antique telephone, and on the walls of the room are projected images and videos of people and events from the past. When someone picks up the phone, they hear a recorded voice on the other end telling a story or anecdote about one of the people or events being shown on the walls. The voice belongs to a person who was directly involved in or affected by the event, but has since passed away.
The catch: The recorded voice is actually being generated by an artificial intelligence program that has been trained to mimic the voices of deceased individuals based on recordings of their speech. As the viewer listens to the story, they are presented with a hauntingly realistic recreation of a voice from the past.
The twist: The story being told is actually a fabrication, created by the AI program based on patterns in the speech recordings of the deceased individual. The story is plausible, and may even be based on real events, but is ultimately a work of fiction.
Through this artwork, viewers are invited to contemplate the nature of memory, storytelling, and the way in which we construct our own narratives about the past. The use of AI-generated voices and fabricated stories raises questions about authenticity, authorship, and the role of technology in shaping our understanding of history.
- palimpsest0
"AI-generated art that focuses primarily on creating images or visual styles can be seen as a continuation of a longstanding tradition of using technology to create art. For example, digital artists have been using computer software to create images and animations for decades. In this sense, AI-generated art can be seen as a natural extension of these earlier efforts, leveraging the latest in machine learning technology to create new and interesting visual experiences.
However, when it comes to AI-generated conceptual art, the stakes are somewhat different. Here, the focus is less on creating aesthetically pleasing images and more on exploring complex ideas and themes. This kind of work can be more challenging to create, as it requires not just technical expertise but also a deep understanding of contemporary art practices and critical theory.
In many ways, AI-generated conceptual art can be seen as a kind of critique of the art world itself, challenging the notion of the artist as a singular, creative genius and calling into question the very idea of authorship. At the same time, this kind of work can also be seen as a reflection of the rapidly evolving relationship between humans and machines, raising important questions about the role of technology in shaping our society, our culture, and our art."
- ChatGPT
- Part 1 - that some propaganda logic right there. Prompting art, and using a digital tool to blur a photo are not on the same spectrum.canoe
- Part 2 - It's most challenging to people who are not artists, for artists that's their livelihood. Humans will always appreciate craft....canoe
- If you've ever seen the movie Sideways, the father of the bride writes off fiction as... "It's just something somebody made up." The same will happen with AI...canoe
- "some computer did it"canoe
- Part 3 - This is whackadoo talk. Computers have no soul. They don't go out into the world and take photos. They only react to us.canoe
- Where does it say "on the doll" that computers have soul?
Also, AI is not a computer.palimpsest - AI thinks engagement = genius.canoe
- You're right AI is not a computer, it's art brocanoe
- And it's critiquing the art world itselfcanoe
- Challenging the very notion of the worthiness of an artist and their genius work. Fuck da Whaaaa?canoe
- OK, bro.palimpsest
- That first paragraph is a near perfect sales pitch. Might be the same one used to talk people out of buying a new oven and going with the microwave.canoe
- I'm hyped up about this palimpsest because... don't you think it's a bit self aggrandizing? I mean the last sentence is the only reality based response imho.canoe
- I would probably remove "this kind of work" unless they were referencing to OpenAI in general as "this kind of work"canoe
- Also, I was using "bro" to emphasize how stupid this sounds "..a kind of critique of the art world itself, challenging the notion of the artist as a singular...canoe
- shapesalad2
https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news…
"Driver slapped with £100 fine after driving through Gatwick Airport's drop off zone uses ChatGPT to write an appeal letter - and gets penalty reduced to just £15"
- sted0
lol what stupid idiot designed this system?
- sted1
- powered by body image disordersted
- fucking hell. On one hand it'll eliminate ageism in the digital workspace, on the other hand- paedo's dream come true_niko
- also middle aged cougars can now become only fans stars lol. what a time to be alive!_niko
- He could be handsome without those metal rings and chin fluff and girly hair cut.shapesalad
- https://www.vice.com…imbecile
- haha nice one, I completely forgot about that :)sted
- @shapesalad scroll down in that thread :)sted
- NBQ000
- Wonder when such tools will come to PowerPoint.shapesalad
- there is one already :)sted
- sted0
- milfhunter0
Bing’s A.I. Chat: ‘I Want to Be Alive.
- https://www.nytimes.…milfhunter
- the reporter is leading the talk tracks to the answers they want.plash
- @plash of course, still funny how you can manipulate this. Just like taytweets back in 2016, who became racist.milfhunter
- Checks notes...We went from ChatGPT putting everyone out of work... Now we are at give it enough time and ChatGPT will become racist.jonny_quest_lives
- Who would've thought brute force scraping the internet then moderating the content using Kenyan BPO workers wouldn't lead to global enlightenment...jonny_quest_lives
- neverscared0
The Generative AI Race Has a Dirty Secret
Integrating large language models into search engines could mean a fivefold increase in computing power and huge carbon emissions.IN EARLY FEBRUARY, first Google, then Microsoft, announced major overhauls to their search engines. Both tech giants have spent big on building or buying generative AI tools, which use large language models to understand and respond to complex questions. Now they are trying to integrate them into search, hoping they’ll give users a richer, more accurate experience. The Chinese search company Baidu has announced it will follow suit.
But the excitement over these new tools could be concealing a dirty secret. The race to build high-performance, AI-powered search engines is likely to require a dramatic rise in computing power, and with it a massive increase in the amount of energy that tech companies require and the amount of carbon they emit.
- sted0
it was fun until it lasted
Microsoft limits Bing chat to five replies to stop the AI from getting real weird
/ Microsoft’s new limits mean Bing chatbot users can only ask a maximum of five questions per session and 50 in total per day.New Bing with ChatGPT may show ads within AI-generated responses
- ApeRobot0
I got a few remixes out.
I used an A.I to make the mastering and another one to extract voices from songs.
https://emastered.com
https://vocalremover.org/I also used Stablediffusion to generate a few prompt that i combined in PS for the cover art.
I had to try, but in the end I find it time consuming and super random.None of these could have been possible 4 years ago.
-Acapella are hard to find and MC out of my budget.
-Mastering is super expensive regarding the income generated by my music (close to zero)I went in the rabbit hole, it was a good exercice to try out those new tools.
I'm pretty happy with the final result.- Cool exercise. Ai and language models are good at figuring out the next word/note but not great at intention imoepic_rim
