Logo Critque
- Started
- Last post
- 31 Responses
- scruffics0
very nice!
main thing that stood out to me (and that only after looking at it for a while) is that the gap (stroke?) between the hand and the sword isn’t as wide as all the other gaps between other elements. not sure how big of a deal that is tho.
- Fax_Benson0
Nice.
If I had to be critical I'd say the legs are a bit chunky - especially the front ones. Getting slight husky dog vibes.
The knight's body shape and head angle don't feel quite right. A little under-developed compared to the horse.
- Thanks, yah, I feel ya, it's definitely a burly horsecanoe
- Continuity0
Overall, I really like it.
From my POV, I think there are too many gaps, and it's robbing the overall logomark of movement and tension. A horse rearing up is high-tension, high-energy, and it feels like some of that missing if the form of the horse (especially at the torso) is split up like that.
- I don't think it would hurt to see it in a more solid form... the client got caught up on the 'missing legs', so I broke it apart.canoe
- _niko0
What’s it for? What’s the name?
Aesthetically it looks nice
- canoe0
It will go on a shield, it will be an emblem made with platinum or titanium, and then it will also be stitched into leather as well as embroidered...
Luxury vehicle made in England - they wanted the knight and horse
- dbloc0
Overall a nice mark. The only part that stands out to me that might need some re-thinking is the body/right arm. I'm guessing that's the right arm.
- spl33nidoru0
I don't mind the legs, it's a stocky look and I like it!
Well done!
- janne0
a bump for hump
- hans_glib-2
the legs are too look like an elephant. i guess not a problem if the vehicle is a lorry or a bus, tho.
- doesnotexist-2
he needs legs
- Too illustrative with the legs. Not the direction we're going in.canoe
- canoe-1
I should have said Logomark Critique... I'm half in the bag - colonoscopy hangover - signs I'm old.