Darwinist
- Started
- Last post
- 592 Responses
- mrdobolina0
what is the significance of 'slinky'
I dont get it.
- discipler0
Oh man i don't remember that one, but anything regarding the Geologic Column, or Uniformitarianism, can be found here:
- ********0
I don't know? some kind of snide remark about bending back and forth who knows?
- discipler0
look here, as well jazX:
- PonyBoy0
Enter response:
... it's such a wonderful...
... fun for a girl and a boy...
- ********0
... while you're linking jazX... you think you could hurry it up on getting me our next white house world christian domination meeting schedule?
PonyBoy
(Jan 5 06, 11:35)
--------------------
Give Rummy a kiss for me, will ya..and tell Laura I'll be a bit late this weekend...
- cphunk0
I've already explained the significance of why I, and possibly others, would want to know a bit more about you. Three times now?
Asking Mimio something about him would deflect my questions............. again. Though something tells me, he would be less dismissive than you. I've seen many different posts from Mimio on this forum.
- ********0
actually right, but I know you're relgious and although Uniformitarianism holds true on a certain level with Creationists, it tends to contradict Catastrophism right? ehhh or maybe not, it can go along side it..
http://www.answersingenesis.org/…
no this isn't the link... it was just facts about some tree that was found to be dated at around 1,000 years old lying between rock that was dated at being 150 Million years old.
- ********0
... while you're linking jazX... you think you could hurry it up on getting me our next white house world christian domination meeting schedule?
PonyBoy
(Jan 5 06, 11:35)
--------------------
Give Rummy a kiss for me, will ya..and tell Laura I'll be a bit late this weekend...
TheTick
(Jan 5 06, 11:38)Sh*t, I knew it, TheTick is President Bush!
- ********0
where do you see yourself in five years?
uberdesigner
(Jan 5 06, 01:41)on the timeline? 5 years older.
geologically? on planet Earth.
spiritually? richer than you.
position? missionary, but still willing to experiment.
spongebob
(Jan 5 06, 01:55)
- discipler0
Yeah, the geolic column is a strange thing. In many places it would indicated a gradualistic development over a long period of time, but in other places it's the opposite. In places, we find layers that should be at the bottom, located at the top along with fossils that "should" be at the bottom, from a naturalistic perspective. We find fish and invertibrate fossils on mountaintops and fossils of animals in the throes of conflict and giving birth - indicating something catastrophic happened. We also see fossils which go thru more than one layer which would indicate sudden catastrophe.
- discipler0
geolic = geologic
- ********0
well sometimes layers get flipped over on folds near fault systems and such. keep that in mind as well, but you're right
- ********0
aha :),
I took a 4 year geology degree at one of the best earth science schools in the country.
I can explain all of that while sat on the john, in the dark, with a crayon on the back of a postcard.
AND simultaneously write an http client in c#
- ********0
aha :),
I took a 4 year geology degree at one of the best earth science schools in the country.
I can explain all of that while sat on the john, in the dark, with a crayon on the back of a postcard.
AND simultaneously write an http client in c#
mikotondria2
(Jan 5 06, 11:51)so did I hehe we are alike
- discipler0
I was just reading about "folding" and it seems that it's only an adequate explanation in certain very specific places. It's not applicable to all situations though.
Great book:
- ********0
Yellowstone is one big giant geological clusterf**k, ain't it...I mean can I see some evidence form somewhere else on the planet a little more geologically stable..
- discipler0
haha
- ********0
there are some odd things out there though, you're right...
http://www.tsc-global.com/rock.h…
I mean, what the hells that ?