EXXON Mobile
- Started
- Last post
- 152 Responses
- JazX0
ohh whatever, as for someone that studied science, even the slightest bit of doubt can lead to a theory being wrong, similar to legal systems, whether it be politics or whatever else this place is full of absolutists.
most of the everyday items you use today has a small amount of hydrocarbons in it. so what, just stop using them. good luck, go join the f*cking vegans.
- mrdobolina0
Nothing would ever get done if the world were 100% sure about Everything.
Especially when a large portion of these scientists that oppose the notion of global warming and it's links to fossil fuel use are paid for by the companies that sell the fuels.
What do environmentalists stand to gain if they get their way?
Nothing.
Then ask yourself:
What do Oil companies have to gain if they get their way?
- JazX0
spk, here's a website that looks very similar to the one you posted. theories, theories everywhere, but not a drop to drink
- pavlovs_dog0
???
So the jazx choices are...
a) use fossil fuels en masse, without regard to the consequences.
or
b) dont use fossil fuels at all, for anything.
- pavlovs_dog0
and you've yet to prove we've landed on the moon.
- JazX0
I'm not supporting Oil Companies persay. Just said, I might like to work for them one day and don't mind having stock in them, especially the small ones.
You have a good point mrdobolina. I'm not saying that all environmentalists have agendas and are crooked, they aren't. I think the same thing can be said about Oil groups.
- mrdobolina0
yep, nothing crooked about exploiting the resources of a few poor middle eastern countries.
nothing at all.
- JazX0
We can use all the fossil fuels we want. They think they have another 1,000 years worth left according to experts. By that time, we will have learned enough about renewable energy sources as to take full advantage of them for everything we use fossil fuels today. Nuclear energy and Electricity will hopefully take over. Capiche?
- mrdobolina0
wow 1,000 years. nothing like rushing to market!
- JazX0
yep, nothing crooked about exploiting the resources of a few poor middle eastern countries.
nothing at all.
mrdobolina
(Jan 30 06, 14:21)ahhh, now you're generalizing, there is much more oil in other areas of the world. Nigeria and Venezuela for example are both part of OPEC.
What was that recent article about the Oil Sands of Canada in Alberta? Said something about more being there than the Middle East.
- Mimio0
The most abundant estimate I heard was around 250 years.
- mrdobolina0
tar sands in alberta.
How many nigerians are seeing that profit?
- JazX0
Since Mars and Venus are warming without human involvement, why is warming on the Earth only possibly caused by humans?
According to tree ring and core data, the temperature dropped suddenly around 1550 and stayed that way until 1850, this period had the coldest temperatures in the previous 8,000 years. Greenland was named Greenland because prior to 1550 it was green. Global Warming alarmists pick 1880, thirty years after the most brutal cold spell in history ended, as the target temperature for the Earth. Why?
Why is it that when you find a climatologist that concedes that volcanic activity has been exceptionally active for the last 25 years, that they say that CO2 from volcanoes actually helps cool the Earth. (High atmosphere CO2 prevents entry of heat.)
From the previous point: since that CO2 in the high atmosphere descends to the lower atmosphere, doesn't that mean we are in for hellishly high temperatures in the future anyway?
Since the Artic was tropical up until 36 million years ago, why is it that plugging in the CO2 data for time period into climate models results temperature way below what was expected?
Assuming that the climate model was accurate to start with, doesn't mean that there are factors that you are unaware of?
Since there is a direct correlation between sunspots and global temperatures, why is sunspot activity ignored in those models? (Record temperatures were all set in the 1930's and 40's, the decadal oscillation people say that it will be as cold as it was in the 1960's early '70s within 30 years because of the expected sunspot cycle.)
------------
Interesting huh?
- mrdobolina0
when a ruling class keeps all of the profit and the citizens are broke as a joke, that is called exploitation.
venezuela is a different story.
- JazX0
tar sands in alberta.
How many nigerians are seeing that profit?
mrdobolina
(Jan 30 06, 14:27)f*cking about 100 in a country 125,000 strong.
Very, very, very corrupt.
sad right?
- pavlovs_dog0
"tar sands in alberta"
thats oil, adn yea mabye 250, at current use...
1,000 is some cracked out shit straight from a right wing think tank.... there is coal for that long, but the conquences of pumping that much c02 into the atmosphere?
what a fucking joke.
jazzy x is so full of shit its leaking out of his nose.
- JazX0
ahhhhhh God has spoken.
Keep believing what you want to believe. Nothing like getting an idea into your head and sticking with it no matter what evidence debunking a theory is found.
Interesting to argue with you gents. And I'm not even completely disagreeing with you boys.
Sad.
- pavlovs_dog0
Interesting huh?
JazX
(Jan 30 06, 14:28)actually, it's not.
that's a lunatic fringe opinion like i.d., faked moon landings, bigfoot, and virgin mary statues bleeding out their assholes.
most SCIENTISTS (see nasa) , not ENVIRONMENTALISTS (see greenpeace) think your as full of shit as i do.
- Mimio0
Right ...250 years if we start converting coal for oil....
I see someone else watches Nova.
- pavlovs_dog0
JazX what the fuck do I have to gain for accepting climate change?
And how was the moon laning faked?