Artificial Intelligence
- Started
- Last post
- 1,637 Responses
- sted1
- drgs2
- drgs-5
- uan2
generate images of spectrograms with stable diffusion
funk bassline with a jazzy saxophone soloconvert spectrograms to an audio clips.
https://www.riffusion.com/about
prompt bookmarks:
https://www.reddit.com/r/riffusi…
- Beeswax0
I really want an AI powered version of me.
He'll go around and do the tasks that I hate to do.Like
"bargain with the car dealer"
"flirt with that girl, james bond style"
"visit my mom, be a good boy, do her chores"
"meet with the annoying friend who keeps calling"
"learn how to trade professionally and trade the market, if you lose, i'll cut your balls"- Really? You've just out-sourced the rich texture of life.Morning_star
- This is pretty close to the premise
of Severancethumb_screws - Google Duplex
https://ai.googleblo…imbecile
- Salarrue2
How to Build Your Career in AI
Insights from AI pioneer Andrew Ng about learning foundational skills, working on projects, finding jobs, and community in machine learning
- Nairn1
A couple of people applied open source Stable Diffusion models to audio spectrograms, enabling 'AI' to start working its same magic on audio and music.
Check out the sample under 'Here is one of our favorites, a beautiful 20-step interpolation from typing to jazz:'
- scarabin0
AI used to generate elements and voice performances in in rick and morty game
- shapesalad0
- This shit would have really helped me out in my art history classes in college back in the mid 90sBonSeff
- NBQ00-1
- sted-1
- jagara0
Playing around with ChatGPT at the moment. I'ts pretty fucking impressive. And it's actually useful already.
- scarabin11
I love seeing folks cranking out AI art better than the stuff i’ve been producing with it, ‘cause it means it’s a field of study in which experimentation and insight pays off. It’s a new tool with room for personal skill. I have a digital artist friend (kirsten zirgibl) who was amazing before, but has been exploring AI tools in producing her work, and is now twice as amazing. Repeatedly, even here, you see that the best outputs are being created by folks who are already artists.
It’s just another thing in our toolboxes. An exciting, powerful thing. I feel like tossing it out as a concept and being anti-AI just because it’s forcing people to rethink things is missing an enormous opportunity. Not only to expand the way you can convey an idea or feeling, but to participate in the new world.
AI isn’t going away. Might as well learn how to coexist with it.
- I tend to agree, but it's also so disposable, I'm much more impressed by a hand-made drawing or artwork from a human hand than a thousand polished AI pieces_niko
- ^thisgrafician
- Yeah, it’s like furniture. The handmade stuff will always be impressive, even if only for that fact.scarabin
- Meanwhile the machine world is producing Aerons that are also very impressivescarabin
- You have a point when it comes to inevitability. But it also sucks if you've realized you've spent two decades learning skills and accruing student debt..garbage
- ..and now a 12 year old can accidentally do it in an hour. And again, the whole point of GANS is to eventually have zero human input.garbage
- That is the endgame. It's not going to be a new tool we use; it will eventually be a replacement. The window of "AI-artist" is going to be very fucking slim.garbage
- I don’t think “artist” as a human class will ever be replaced entirely. It’s a human impulse to create. The role of “AI artists” WILL change a lot for years thoscarabin
- In the end, a company still has to type prompts and someone needs to be paid for thatscarabin
- GANs were invented almost a decade ago, only recently training got easier with cloud computing (thousands of nvidia A100 cards)grafician
- Someone will still need to put it all together into a campaign and i’m not trusting suzie from accounting to do itscarabin
- but it's only still very limited tech, so nah, don't buy into tools are replacing us lol wtfgrafician
- agreed @scarabin. It's a powerful new tool we have to come to grips with. It's not going away. It IS going to change how we work.It might take a lot of our jobsmonNom
- Not many layout artists sticking things down with rubylith these days. Not many retouchers working in a darkroom.
And god help you if you specialized in flash!monNom - But holy shit if you wanted to make a painted graphic novel, that just went from a year-long endeavour to a month.monNom
- In time, AAA games and Blockbuster movies are going to be within reach of individual creators.monNom
- If hollywood weren’t so broken i’d say it could lead to movies being produced cheaper and thus better working conditions and “riskier” films being madescarabin
- I think Hollywood is going the way of rubylith.monNom
- ...along with the whole ecosystem that comes with it. But movies will still be made. Maybe better movies than are possible now given the constraints.monNom
- No point in investing time in fine-tuning your prompts, they work differently for every model and next year there will be something differentdrgs
- If infantile ai can replace an education you haven’t paid for yet, the problem is not aiimbecile
- "AI Library" - a directory that lists 300+ such tools https://library.phyg…neverscared
- its great for memesmilfhunter
- Good take. No one should complain that AI is a “cheat,” without also citing Photoshop, computers, the Internet, electricity, running water...ptrdo
- scarabin1
In regards to so-called “art theft”- AI training on artist’s work- i can’t even get upset about that.
I as a meat bag personally trained on millions of art pieces without the author’s consent. I’ve stolen concepts and styles and used them for years to my own ends. Everyone here has. That’s why we study art. It’s one of the reasons QBN exists. We share and consume new works in the world and our training base grows.
Every time you publish a piece you risk someone ripping it off. Design an incredible new chair and within a year there will be mass-produced knockoffs. It’s always been that way.
- A style trend is impossible without folks riffing on the original creator’s lookscarabin
- https://www.azquotes…scarabin
- Agee, impossible for any artist not to have been influenced, inspired by or straight up copied any artist before him_niko
- yea... but your not a company (midjourney) creating a commercial product charging coustomers per render based on stolen assets.jonny_quest_lives
- also agree_niko
- even the latest quotes from the midjourney founder David Holz are cringe...jonny_quest_lives
- "How was the dataset built?" David Holz: "It’s just a big scrape of the Internet. "jonny_quest_lives
- for a commercial product.jonny_quest_lives
- "Did you seek consent from living artists or work still under copyright?"jonny_quest_lives
- David Holz: "No. There isn’t really a way to get a hundred million images and know where they’re coming from. "jonny_quest_lives
- As a commercial artist i’m a company creating a product (posters) and charging clients per comp based on “stolen assets” (reference material).scarabin
- You use “david carson” in your mental prompts when masking an edgy new type piece. Even if it’s subconsciously, you’re “stealing” from past artistsscarabin
- but you assume all the copyright infringement as you are sentient and if you get too close to your "reference"jonny_quest_lives
- people are going to call out your theft and shit on your work as theft unless you brought a fresh new spin to the workjonny_quest_lives
- prompting isn't puling scrap, mediating on a design, sitting through a crit, making revs then dealing with client feedback.jonny_quest_lives
- ...which i do. Which midjourney also does. My point is that anti-ai folks’ definition of “theft” is no different than what we do as people naturally.scarabin
- i do. not fear this technology oin the slightest as long as their are marketing departments with changes. i just feel the datasets need to be built on publicjonny_quest_lives
- domain work and artists who actually opt in to the training. clients are alway going to client and this tech could be revolutionary if they slow downjonny_quest_lives
- and rebuild their training models. also "in the style of" propmting needs to be adressed especially if it's a commercial productjonny_quest_lives
- but what was the goal of midjourney?jonny_quest_lives
- they aren't offering it to everyone for free cuz it "emulates: human artistry. i refuse to assign an algorithm human sentience or give it a pass.jonny_quest_lives
- it's software made a by a company and as such they have to abide by legal restraints not only in the US but the world.jonny_quest_lives
- They've created a commercial product capable of reproducing copyright works near instantly and charge users for it.jonny_quest_lives