Midjourney AI
- Started
- Last post
- 481 Responses
- NBQ000
My enthusiasm in the beginning has faded a bit. For some reason I never get clean and precise results no matter what prompts I put in.
Every time I try to get some character or animal I always get some distorted piece of shit result. Often something like a siamese thing with two eyeballs fit in one eyesocket.
I put in prompts like "photo real, ultra realistic, high detail" etc etc. I even use the prompts generator but I get crappy shit anyway.
It's kinda frustrating to see all these high-fidelity results by other people and I get crap results no matter what I do.
- Creating variations improves the result, to me that's when the good stuff comes up.spl33nidoru
- Shit In > Shit Out.Nairn
- I try variations but all I get is basically very identical looking images. And I mean pretty much 95%-98% identical. So often variations are just useless.NBQ00
- I really don't get what y'all's doing.palimpsest
- you need to use the language that is used in the associated text when presenting images. like writing clickbait for what you want to seekingsteven
- I still haven't had problems talking with AI, maybe that is a problem I should look into.palimpsest
- IT TAKES AN ARTISTnb
- Two eyeballs, One socketcanoe
- PhanLo0
For low budget Fantasy books, I could imagine that being the norm, also thought that for indie music folk too.
-
- Massive improvement in Doom metal album artwork in the past year. Haven't seen one pencil doodle scanned off a goths lever arch filekingsteven
- Ramanisky210
From Reddit // Grand Theft Lebowski
- Have doubts this is straight unedited Midjourney.
Source?grafician - method: https://medium.com/m…
he used —test —creative params.uan - sauce is: https://www.reddit.c…uan
- https://www.reddit.c…Ramanisky2
- Details in the hair, hands almost good, yeah no still don't buy it even tho' he said it was straight MJgrafician
- And optimising for faces while the rest of the details are still shit is not an advancement for MJgrafician
- dedeyessted
- LOL, sted.palimpsest
- grafi be like:
4/10
Would not prompt.palimpsest - @pali LOL truegrafician
- I mean, the things I've seen generated by these models...
smhgrafician - show us your prompts graf_me_
- Yes this looks almost too good to be true. Very high detail and very defined. No smears, no uneven blotches or deformations.NBQ00
- All fantastic +********
- grafi, what in the details bothers you?
Draw red circles around it.palimpsest - I think the buttons are a nice touch, or maybe they're faked to make it look less (or more) real? But I'm looking for your expert opinion.palimpsest
- So goodscarabin
- Have doubts this is straight unedited Midjourney.
- uan1
mj prompt:
Peter Stormare, big Lebowski , Gta vice city, GTA 5 cover art, borderlands style, cel-shading, trending on artstation --test --creativeresult (upscaled):
- (for graf)
and yes, dead eyes (for sted)uan - Aaron Rodgers?Ramanisky2
- of this 2 images:
https://imgur.com/SZ…uan - still telling me no Photoshop LOLgrafician
- just ad some background description and image ratio to the prompt and you are good.uan
- so the guy lied that was the straight up MJ prompt used as we clearly see there's no match in the details and backgrounds ffsakegrafician
- what are you talking about...he just gave a more complete description on what he wanted and mj rendered it.uan
- (for graf)
- grafician-1
comparison MJ vs. SD for the same prompt:
"Peter Stormare, big Lebowski , Gta vice city, GTA 5 cover art, borderlands style, cel-shading, trending on artstation"
https://www.reddit.com/r/midjour…
- so still telling me no Photoshop? LOL
the backgrounds are clearly not MJ AT LEASTgrafician - also asking the model for portraits when it was optimised for square images always gives "mixed" results so in no way that guy exported perfect portraits commongrafician
- read the medium article posted in the Ramanisky2 post. some hints there on width/height ratio and the experimental styles they are testing.uan
- @uan that's an old article I already knew all that and no, still not explaining these almost "perfect" portraitsgrafician
- go play with it instead of arguing nonsense here.:-)uan
- I've been doing that for months now, from DALL E to SD and MJ lol
See all most posts in these threads
I know when to call bullshitgrafician - *all my posts in these threadsgrafician
- as in I know the limits of each model so in no way you get good results straight up from any of these
as they say "haters say it's photoshop" yeah ofcgrafician - I know you have access. just saying the more precise you prompt, the better the results. it's a game of try and error and see if the machine understands you.uan
- it's the same creative process as drawing/painting/sea... stock images, just with a really fast (but sometimes stupid) rendering tool.uan
- No, not really, precision is not crucial at all, you just gotta hit "dream" or whatever hundreds of times and hope you get a good one, no kiddinggrafician
- so still telling me no Photoshop? LOL
- grafician-1
so taking uan's export and compare it to another SD export, same exact prompt:
vs.
as you can see these two versions match better as if they were exported from the same model
compared to the original portraits presented, the quality of these is like 60% JPG vs. 98% JPG
so yeah
- nb2
Boring.
Not art.
Yawn.
- _me_17
grafician, balkan man, internet nerd, knowitall, boring, portrait, straight to camera, muted, minimal, low angle, photographic, high details...
remastered. upscaled.
i think its pretty accurate tbh.
haha x
- dead eyesNBQ00
- Beard is on point!palimpsest
- Your obsession with me is wild...grafician
- Continuity3
This one's for Akagiyama
- canoe3
Sometimes before I go to bed I Midjourney for fun to create stories for songs...
- PhanLo3
https://twitter.com/SALT_VERSE
-
SALT is the world's first fully AI-generated multiplot "film" - a web6 internet adventure where your choices create a 1970s lo-fi sci-fi universe.
-
- Nairn3
I somehow managed to get fucking Tam o' shanters in a gen, lol
