Apple
- Started
- Last post
- 3,702 Responses
- georgesIII0
- Heil Apple!
Heil Apple!
Heil Apple!organicgrid - this is "pissed off" ?inteliboy
- He was a buddhist. This is a PISSED OFF buddhist.ideaist
- he was always a doucheWeyland
- so what?monospaced
- Heil Apple!
- i_monk0
> click Firefox in dock
> notification: Try the new Safari
> options: Later or NowFuck off.
- http://apple.stackex…i_monk
- Really? I never get thatpango
- nb0
^ Ugh, that suuuucks.
- robotinc0
2010s apple == 2000s microsoft
- how so?monospaced
- people have been saying Apple sucks since they formed the 80's. nothing new.inteliboy
- Most business still use Windowspango
- organicgrid0
- gemius train for 2 weeks before starting to work, wowwwwwww stunningGeorgesII
- Hombre_Lobo0
its quite ridiculous how much more battery chrome seems to use compared to safari on a macbook.
I check the energy imapct (in activity monitor) with the same tabs open in each browser and chrome is doing 160 and safari is doing 30.
Shame as I much prefer chromes dev tools, and chrome generally.
Anyone else find this? Obviously apple have done some cool wizardry to make safaris performance friendly for battery use.
Any i know chrome splits each tab into a separate process which im sure doesnt help.
- Or they have done cool wizardry to make Chrome suck more. Android's don't seem to have this problem, eh?formed
- haha yeah. just like itunes on windows, runs like ass. yeh chrome on my android is great. can have like 100+ tabs open, np at all!Hombre_Lobo
- This is about desktop browsers. Lol.monospaced
- Indeed we are, but his point is still very valid.Hombre_Lobo
- safari is probably using stuff that's already running on osx, while chrome has to run everything by itself?uan
- I dunno... using Chrome on the Windows partition is also pretty inefficient compared to Safarimonospaced
- also, if Apple was purposefully making Chrome slower, don't you think Google would point that out somewhere?monospaced
- @uan os x's core technologies are open source, so anyone and everyone has access to everything, not just Applemonospaced
- Theres an Apple popup that prompts you to use Safari because it saves energy.instrmntl
- instrmntl0
Every since the latest iOs update my iPhone5 bsttery life is complete shit. My phone dies in 2 hours.
- ********0
- cute and nostalgic idea :)PonyBoy
- memories :)
Gnash - suppose they could make an iMac mini even if mostly uselessmonospaced
- Reminds me of a POSinstrmntl
- wasn't a piece of shit at the time********
- Point Of Sale?SteveJobs
- Penis offal soup********
- And... where exactly does the CD go when you put it in that slot? Vertical?SigDesign
- It's not a cd slotmonospaced
- ZOOP0
Edward Snowden says secret Apple spyware is the reason he won’t use an iPhone http://bgr.com/2015/01/20/iphone…
- ********0
"Is Apple’s wildly popular iPhone series hiding spyware that can collect information about users without their knowledge?"
- they'll be disapointed to collect all that info about Candy Crush Sagabenfal99
- GeorgesII0
top
http://www.cnbc.com/id/102363719…
The much heralded Apple Watch, the tech giant's first new product category since the launch of the iPad, will go to market this year with a battery life that could be as low as 2.5 hours for active use, according to a report in 9to5mac.That battery duration—2.5 to 4 hours—applies to the most active use of the watch. For more passive use, battery life could be as long as several days before it needs recharging.
- ughWeyland
- isn't this what was expected? Seems like common sense - small battery = short lifeformed
- plus, you use the watch for about 10-30 seconds at a time. The rest of the time it's passive.monospaced
- For occasional glances, you can have hundreds of uses during the day without running out of battery.monospaced
- the point is: you have to think about the batterycannonball1978
- somebody will come up with a better extension that will make it look like this https://psychopandas…yurimon
- It'll be an issue with all wearables. You want all that fancy screen stuff, it's gonna suck the life out. I don't see the point it being black 99% of the time.formed
- point in it being black 99% of the time, but that's me.formed
- battery life is the main reason most people won't get one of these, and the reason I have no interestmonospaced
- ALSO, only low use can last up to 4 days. Apparently. But it's always much more fun to take stabs at Apple.inteliboy
- jesus - you guys considering getting one? This will be Apple's google glass.fadein11
- it won't be it's Glass for many reasons: a) it's shipping, b) millions will buy, c) developers are making apps alreadymonospaced
- organicgrid0
- Being obnoxious, especially an obnoxious nerd, really outweighs any of his achievements.inteliboy
- According to most comments on the internet.inteliboy
- if he wasn't who he was, you wouldn't be reading this right now on your macMilan
- nope - would just be reading it on another PC, on a different operating system getting all the same info.fadein11
- doubtfulmonospaced
- lvl_130
- ?monospaced
- well it's not hipster. so I guess this guy has it figured out!inteliboy
- mekk0
Over 18 Billion Dollar Profit. This is massive. How much would it be if Apple would pay legit taxes?
- Just like Google.inteliboy
- Or any other shithole of bigass companymekk
- if they paid normal non-loophole taxes - most of America wouldn't have to.fadein11
- name one large company, mekk, that pays legit taxesmonospaced
- it's the most massive profit any company has ever pulled in in a single quarter, evermonospaced
- mono, oh I see now, others do it too. Then it's okay.mekk
- no, just saying that singling Apple out is absolutely ridiculous, especially when they do so much IN THE USAmonospaced
- people single Apple out just like they single McDonalds out.inteliboy
- but all these companies do fucked things. though Subway is healthy! and Google are fun and never evil!inteliboy
- iCanHazQBN0
I think all their cash is in Nevada, where they are protected from paying corporate tax, or something along those lines.
